mercsour intransparenz englisch

Before the agreement was politically concluded on June 28, 2019, the quantity and quality of the documents published on the website of the Directorate-General for Trade were worse than those published for the highly controversial TTIP agreement with the USA. [...] Since December 2020, the European Commission has been holding talks on an additional protocol to the EU-Mercosur trade agreement in order to rectify the problems highlighted by civil society and experts and to increase the ability of both the EU Council and the European Parliament to approve the agreement.21 Friends of the Earth Europe (FOEE) made a request for access to the documents of the EU's. [...] Therefore, there is currently no decision on the legal framework of the agreement".28 Since then, several press articles have reported the EC’s will to split the trade pillar of the agreement.29 The option of splitting is essential from the point of view of transparency and democracy, as the public has a right to know whether or not their national parliaments are taking a decision on the agreement. [...] The document explains the reasons behind the proposal and sets out the objectives that the Commission plans to achieve during the negotiations, as well as the expected scope of the agreement.” Source: European Commission: Transparency Policy in DG TRADE - Listening and Engaging, Brussels, November 2018. [...] 6: Compare reports on different negotiation rounds: (Reports (publication date)): Report of the 38th Round, March 2019; Report of the 37th Round, January 2019; Report of the 36th Round, December 2018; Report of the 35th Round, September 2018; Report of the 34th Round, July 2018; Report of the 33rd Round, June 2018; Report of the 32nd Round, March 2018; Report of the 31st Round, December 2017; Repo.