The post-Brexit vision of a UK finally free to do trade deals around the world is giving way to reality:
free trade agreements deliver marginal benefits and little influence, particularly for the UK’s serviceoriented economy.
After Britain’s decision to leave the European Union, the government and Brexiteers argued that the UK’s
new ability to cut trade deals around the world would not only compensate for any loss of access to the
EU’s single market, but also free the UK to strike deals with high-growth economies in Asia and with the
US. The UK government set out to quickly replace the extensive network of EU free trade agreements
(FTAs) and expand it with new agreements with countries such as Australia, India and the US, as well as
the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP) regional agreement
for countries on either side of the Pacific.
Overall, these negotiations were very successful. The UK quickly established a new Department for
International Trade and rapidly sealed an impressive number of FTAs between 2019-2020. When the
UK left the EU customs union on 31 December 2020 it was able to largely replace the trade relations it
had as an EU member with new, UK-specific ones. A very impressive 36 UK FTAs entered into force in
2021, including the EU-UK Trade and Co-operation Agreement (TCA). The UK also concluded completely
new agreements with Australia and New Zealand and is set to join the CPTPP. The success of these
negotiations has become emblematic of post-Brexit trade policy and helped propel then trade minister
Liz Truss to the position of Prime Minister.
However, the successes of the UK’s post Brexit trading policy should not be overplayed. The vast majority
of UK FTAs are continuity agreements that simply replicate prior agreements. This helps avoid disruption
by preserving the status quo as much as possible but it does not give new market access. At the same
time, the hoped-for trade deal with the US failed to materialise, largely because of the increasingly
protectionist mood in Washington.
Authors
- Published in
- United Kingdom