The comments of Lindsay Lowell and the participants at the seminar on Global Competition for International Students at Georgetown University’s Institute for the Study of International Migration, along with the financial support of the latter are. [...] In this framework Canada’s brain exchange with the United States and the rest of the world is estimated in terms of numbers of movers and the values of the embedded human capital. [...] The substantial emigration of skilled Canadians in the late 1950s to the mid-1960s came at a time of capacity limitations in Canadian universities and prior to the advent of Canada’s aggressive pro skilled immigration policy of the 1970s. [...] Education under Canada’s defining legislation, the British North American Act, was a provincial responsibility thus only indirect methods were available to the federal government to expand Canada’s universities and technical schools.2 However, immigration by the 1970s was an exclusive jurisdiction of the federal government and subject to the discretion of the Minister of Manpower and Immigration. [...] First, he argues that there should be a temporary halt in immigration flows and next he argues that Canada should return to the “tap on- tap off” policy of the 1980s.4 The purpose of this section is to argue that the 1990s represented a watershed in Canadian immigration policy with respect to the recruitment of the highly skilled.