This article considers a subset of lawsuits in which emancipated people sued to have their enslavers’ bequests to them honored. It contends that we should see these suits as contests over reparations. By exploring this unappreciated history, this article argues that enslavers themselves believed reparations were due and were willing to pay them, that there was a general agreement between enslaved and enslaver about the form reparations should take, and that there was a similar understanding that reparations should be generational. The article further suggests the promise of additional inquiry into historical testamentary records. Such a novel archive would add to contemporary arguments in favor of reparations by identifying an unacknowledged effort to provide compensation to formerly enslaved people.
Authors
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.7758/RSF.2024.10.2.06
- ISBN
- 2377-8253 2377-8261
- Published in
- United States of America
- Rights
- © 2024 Russell Sage Foundation. Perrone, Giuliana. 2024. “Rehearsals for Reparations.” RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences 10(2): 132–50.https://doi.org/10.7758/RSF.2024.10.2.06. For their generative comments and suggestions, the author thanks editors Daina Ramey Berry, Thomas Craemer, William Darity Jr. and Dania Frank Francis; Chris Bovbjerg; Randy Bovbjerg; Jeannine DeLombard; Kathleen Moore; attendees of the conference “Black Reparations: Insights from the Social Sciences”; Suzanne Nichols and the staff of the Russell Sage Foundation; and anonymous reviewers. Direct correspondence to: Giuliana Perrone, at gperrone@ucsb.edu, Department of History, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA 93106-9410, United States.