Cash transfers in general appear to be more effective than in-kind transfers or vouchers at improving a range of outcomes, including decreasing monetary poverty, improving health and nutrition, and increasing food security, across diverse country contexts, program objectives, and design features. However, identifying a superior modality is challenging due to the heterogeneity in context, program design, and objectives of the studies reviewed, despite evidence generally favoring the effectiveness of cash transfers and acknowledging the enhanced effectiveness of a combination of modalities, referred to as cash plus, in specific cases.
Authors
- Citation
- “ World Bank . 2024 . Cash or In-Kind Transfers: Do Outcomes Vary According to Transfer Modality? . Social Protection and Jobs Policy and Technical Note; No.32; Evidence at Your Fingertips Series . © Washington, DC: World Bank . http://hdl.handle.net/10986/41714 License: CC BY-NC 3.0 IGO . ”
- Collection(s)
- Policy Notes
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1596/41714
- Identifier externaldocumentum
- 34340561
- Identifier internaldocumentum
- 34340561
- Published in
- United States of America
- RelationisPartofseries
- Social Protection and Jobs Policy and Technical Note; No.32; Evidence at Your Fingertips Series
- Report
- 191207
- Rights
- CC BY-NC 3.0 IGO
- Rights Holder
- World Bank
- Rights URI
- https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/igo
- UNIT
- Social Protection & Labor Global (HSPGE)
- URI
- https://hdl.handle.net/10986/41714
- date disclosure
- 2024-06-14
- region geographical
- World