RUN is also highly supportive welcomes the choice, equity and diversity of the elevation of First Nation focus and objectives of the proposed ATEC, and offers representation in the design of the ATEC and feedback to this consultation process that looks forward to contributing to the success of seeks to enhance the focus, impact and this important mandate. [...] Finally, rather than being designed to proactively reduce the net regulatory burden However, RUN holds concerns about the views upon providers, the design of the ATEC seems expressed in the consultation paper regarding to be canvassed in such a way that merely the exclusion of specialist sectoral staff from attempts to minimise the additional burden their involvement in the ATEC, both at the the A. [...] Moving forward, RUN believes it is important to ensure that the stewardship of our higher In order to achieve the objectives of the ATEC, education system has the structure, expertise, and ensuring the ATEC has sufficient expertise, and agency to adopt a more nuanced view of RUN suggests the adoption of a staged the needs of regional Australians. [...] As such, purpose through: (a)”, RUN would like to see RUN prioritises the affordability of study, the restoration of the full statement from beyond that of fee/loan pricing alone to include the Accord Final Report – National Tertiary things such as the affordability of compulsory Objective, to include “infrastructure”, noting placements, the upfront costs of study, and the the central role played. [...] As such, RUN would is important that the process of transferring not support the seemingly diminished view of key responsibilities from the Department of university infrastructure taken by the proposed Education to ATEC, alongside the roll-out of the ATEC in the consultation paper.
- Pages
- 15
- Published in
- Australia
