The idea behind dental insurance is relatively straightforward. You
pay the insurance company a certain amount every month; they
agree to cover some of the costs of your dental care.
But what happens if they’re collecting a lot more from those
monthly premium payments than they’re paying out for treatment.
Is that unfair? Or just part of the business model? And should the
state get involved, perhaps by requiring dental insurers to spend a
certain percentage of their monthly premiums on patient care —
just as we already do for medical insurance?
Voters will get to answer these questions in November as part of
Ballot Question 2, which would set new rules for dental insurers,
including a requirement that 83 cents of every dollar collected in
premiums is spent on patients’ dental work.
This 83 cent standard is referred to as the “loss ratio.” And as part
of our mission to help voters understand state ballot questions,
we have reviewed relevant research and spoken with a variety of
experts about the potential impact a minimum loss ratio could
have on dental insurance and care in Massachusetts.
Related Organizations
- Pages
- 7
- Published in
- United States of America
Table of Contents
- The idea behind dental insurance is relatively straightforward. You pay the insurance company a certain amount every month they agree to cover some of the costs of your dental care. 1
- But what happens if theyre collecting a lot more from those monthly premium payments than theyre paying out for treatment. 1
- We found that 2
- Question 2 also includes a number of reporting requirements that would shed useful light on the dental insurance market and allow for better-grounded regulations moving forward. 2
- In the sections that follow we describe this ballot initiative in greater detail share further background on insurance loss ratios and discuss the likely impact of yes and no votes. 2
- WHAT BALLOT QUESTION 2 WOULD DO 3
- THE INSPIRATION FOR QUESTION 2 3
- IMPACT OF A YES VOTE 4
- IMPACT OF A NO VOTE 5
- OPTIONS FOR THE LEGISLATURE 5
- CONCLUSION 6