A new index for assessing the dimensionality underlying a set of test items was investigated. The incremental fit index (IFI) is based on the sum of squares of the residual covariances. Purposes of the study were to: (1) examine the distribution of the IFI in the null situation, with truly unidimensional data; (2) examine the rejection rate of the IFI under various simulation conditions of a two-dimensional test structure; and (3) compare the performance of the IFI with the T-statistic of W. Stout (1987). Data sets were computer-generated for sample sizes of 500 and 1,000 with test lengths of 15 and 45 items each. The IFI based on the sum of the squares of the residual covariances of the one-dimensional and two-dimensional non-linear factor analyses of dichotomous test data did show fairly high rejection rates of unidimensionality when two-dimensional data were generated. The results suggest that the statistic has the potential for use in the assessment of unidimensionality of test data and in the determination of the number of dimensions underlying a test. The T-statistic seemed best suited for long tests having large sample sizes, while the IFI might be preferable for smaller test lengths or smaller samples. Five tables present study data. A 23-item list of references is included. (SLD)
Authors
- Peer Reviewed
- F
- Publication Type
- ['Reports - Research', 'Speeches/Meeting Papers']
- Published in
- United States of America
Table of Contents
- Assessing Test Dimensionality Using An Index 2
- Research Association April 41 2
- Running Head IFI Test of Dimensi.onality 2
- Assessing Test Dimensionality Using An Index 3
- The numerous studies dealing with Item Response Theory IRT 3
- The majority of the research in this field 4
- Results obtained by Zwick 5
- A test consisting of items U3 5
- N is said to be essentially unidimensional if there exists a 5
- T statistic Stout 1987. In addition Nandakumar 1987 6
- 1987 and Nandakumar 1987. 6
- More 6
- 1989 and McDonald 1989. 6
- McDonald 1967. 6
- McDonald 1989. 7
- Examine the dist.ribution of the IFI in the null situation 9
- By doing this 10
- In every case the IFI was calculated. 11
- IFI1 using the 1-factor and 2-factor SSmm. 11
- Specifically item difficulty arid discrimination 11
- Two test 11
- Item difficulty 11
- However the cutoffs are much smaller for the 45 item 13
- Its number of 17
- 1990 or the 17
- IFI might be preferable. 17
- A. 1985. 18
- A computer program for 18
- IRT estimtign of compensatory and nongompensatory 18
- An examination of the 18
- Paper presented at the annual meeting of 18
- Francisco CA. 19
- Applied Psychological Meourement 19
- A FORTRAN Program for fitting 19
- Armidale Australia The University of 19
- Five decades of Item Response 19
- Modelling. 19
- Assessing the 19
- Amherst MA 19
- University of Massachussets Faculty of Education. ERIC 19
- An empirical study of various indices for 20
- Research 111 49-78. 20
- McDonald R.P. 1967. 20
- McDonald R.P. Ahlawat K.S. 1974 20
- McDonald R.P. 1981. 20
- McDonald R.P. 1989. 20
- Nardakumar R. 20
- Nandakumar R. 20
- Nandakumar R. 21
- San Francisco CA. 21
- Reckase M.D. 1979 21
- Parameters when estimateol from multidimensional data. 21
- Paper 21
- Toronto Ont. 21
- Item Response Theory and Factor Analysis of discretized 21
- Sample Size 24
- 45 Items 24
- Skewness 24
- Kurtosis 24
- Table 3 25
- Number of Reiections of Unidimensionality Using te T Statistic 25
- Test Length 25
- Sample Size 26
- Table 5 27
- Numbgr of Reiecti2qns of Unidimensionality per 100 27
- Sample Size 27