Authors
- Disclosure Date
- 2024/08/27
- Disclosure Status
- Disclosed
- Doc Name
- Viet Nam - Forest Sector Modernization Coastal Re
- Lending Instrument
- Investment Project Financing
- Pages
- 18
- Product Line
- IBRD/IDA
- Published in
- United States of America
- Rel Proj ID
- VN-Forest Sector Modernization And Coastal Resilience Enhancement -- P157127
- TF No/Name
- TF0A6172-Bringing International Best Practice to Inform Key Forest Sector Issues
- Unit Owning
- EAP ENR PM 2 (SEAE2)
- Version Type
- Final
Table of Contents
- Independent Evaluation Group IEG 1
- 1. Project Data 1
- Project ID Project Name 1
- Country Practice AreaLead 1
- LCTF Numbers Closing Date Original Total Project Cost USD 1
- Bank Approval Date Closing Date Actual 1
- IBRDIDA USD Grants USD 1
- Prepared by Reviewed by ICR Review Coordinator Group 1
- 2. Project Objectives and Components 1
- DEVOBJTBL a. Objectives 1
- Independent Evaluation Group IEG 2
- Did the Board approve the revised objectiveskey associated outcome targets 2
- Component 1 Enabling Effective Coastal Forest Management Appraised GoV US3 million Actual GoV US0.73 million 2
- 1.1 a b c d 2
- 1.2 a b c 2
- 1.3 a b 2
- Component 2 Coastal Forest Development and Rehabilitation Appraised IDA US104.86 million GoV US7.22 million Actual IDA US22.80 million GoV US2.30 million 2
- 2.1 a b c d 2
- 2.2 a i ii b 2
- Component 3 Generating Sustainable Benefits from Coastal Forests Appraised IDA US40.42 million GoV US2.95 million Actual IDA US26.08 million GoV US3.77 million 2
- 3.1 2
- Independent Evaluation Group IEG 3
- 3.2 3
- Component 4 Project Management and ME Appraised IDA US4.72 million GoV US16.84 million Actual IDA US2.04 million GoV US5.34 million 3
- 4.1 3
- 4.2 3
- Project Cost 3
- Financing 3
- Borrower Contribution 3
- Dates 3
- Restructuring 3
- Independent Evaluation Group IEG 4
- Split Rating 4
- 3. Relevance of Objectives 4
- Rationale 4
- Country Situation 4
- Country Strategy 4
- Bank Strategy 4
- Independent Evaluation Group IEG 5
- Level at which the PDO is Pitched 5
- Rating 5
- 4. Achievement of Objectives Efficacy 5
- OBJECTIVE 1 5
- Objective 5
- Rationale 5
- Theory of Change ToC 5
- Independent Evaluation Group IEG 6
- Outputs 6
- Outcomes 6
- Independent Evaluation Group IEG 7
- Rating 7
- OBJECTIVE 1 REVISION 1 7
- Revised Objective 7
- Revised Rationale 7
- Independent Evaluation Group IEG 8
- Outputs 8
- Outcomes 8
- Revised Rating 8
- OVERALL EFFICACY 8
- Rationale 8
- Independent Evaluation Group IEG 9
- Overall Efficacy Rating Primary Reason 9
- OVERALL EFFICACY REVISION 1 9
- Overall Efficacy Revision 1 Rationale 9
- Overall Efficacy Revision 1 Rating Primary Reason 9
- 5. Efficiency 9
- Independent Evaluation Group IEG 10
- Efficiency Rating 10
- Rate Available Point value CoverageScope 10
- Independent Evaluation Group IEG 11
- 6. Outcome 11
- Outcome Rating 11
- 7. Risk to Development Outcome 11
- Government risk 11
- Institutional risk 11
- Independent Evaluation Group IEG 12
- Climatic risk 12
- 8. Assessment of Bank Performance 12
- Independent Evaluation Group IEG 13
- Quality-at-Entry Rating 13
- Quality of Supervision Rating 13
- Overall Bank Performance Rating 13
- 9. ME Design Implementation Utilization 13
- Independent Evaluation Group IEG 14
- Independent Evaluation Group IEG 15
- ME Quality Rating 15
- 10. Other Issues 15
- Environmental 15
- Environmental Assessment Natural Habitats Pest Management Physical Cultural Resources Forests 15
- Social 15
- Indigenous Peoples Involuntary Resettlement 15
- Financial Management 15
- Independent Evaluation Group IEG 16
- Procurement 16
- Grievance redress 16
- 11. Ratings 16
- Ratings ICR IEG Reason for DisagreementsComment 16
- Independent Evaluation Group IEG 17
- 12. Lessons 17
- In designing activities that need to be appropriate for specific situations such as coastal afforestation plans consultations with local communities can improve the outcomes ICR para 90. 17
- 13. Assessment Recommended 17
- 14. Comments on Quality of ICR 17
- Independent Evaluation Group IEG 18
