cover image: ARC Centre of Excellence in Population Ageing

ARC Centre of Excellence in Population Ageing

22 Aug 2024

This leads to the income payments in the MD state after 11 years being lower than the income payments in the D state since the balance in the MD state is lower than the balance in the D state and not enough to generate a higher income payment than the D state. [...] We can see that for the age 80 cohort, the income in the D state is higher than in the MD state because we observe that the probability of death in the D state is significantly higher than in the MD state after age 85, that is q3(t) > q4(t) for t > 5. [...] From the above illustration, we can see that the state-dependent accumulation factor depends on the initial state at the beginning of the year and also the state at the end of the year. [...] We can also see that the change in the H and M states are at a relatively low level at around 1%, while the change in the D state is around 4% ≠ 5% and the change in the MD state is around 13% ≠ 16%, indicating that with the proposed health state-dependent risk-sharing rule, the income in the less healthy state can be increased by a significant amount at a relatively small cost of the healthy memb. [...] We can also see from Figure 16 that for individuals aged 80 joined at time 0, the income payments in the D and MD states are 3 and 3.25 times the payments in the H state but last for a shorter period of time, which corresponds with the shorter life expectancy at age 80 in the D and MD states.
Pages
40
Published in
Australia

Table of Contents