Bolivia - BO Nat'l Roads Airport Infrastructure (English)

Table of Contents

• Independent Evaluation Group IEG 1
• 1. Project Data 1
• Project ID Project Name 1
• Country Practice AreaLead 1
• LCTF Numbers Closing Date Original Total Project Cost USD 1
• Bank Approval Date Closing Date Actual 1
• IBRDIDA USD Grants USD 1
• Prepared by Reviewed by ICR Review Coordinator Group 1
• 2. Project Objectives and Components 1
• DEVOBJTBL a. Objectives 1
• To improve i year-round transitability of the national road and ii safety security and operational reliability of the Airport. 1
• Independent Evaluation Group IEG 2
• Did the Board approve the revised objectiveskey associated outcome targets 2
• Date of Board Approval 2
• 1. Improving the s National Road 2
• 2. Improving the Airport. 2
• 3. Institutional strengthening of the National Road Agency ABC AASANA and other relevant entities 2
• Independent Evaluation Group IEG 3
• Project cost. 3
• Project financing. 3
• Borrower contribution. 3
• Dates. 3
• Other changes. 3
• Through the first restructuring on December 28 2016 3
• Independent Evaluation Group IEG 4
• Through the second restructuring on July 25 2018 4
• Through the third project restructuring on October 2 2018 4
• Through the sixth project restructuring on August 2 2022 4
• Split rating. 4
• 3. Relevance of Objectives 4
• Rationale 4
• Country context. 4
• Road sector context. 4
• Independent Evaluation Group IEG 5
• Air sector context 5
• Government strategy 5
• World Bank WB strategy. 5
• Previous Bank experience 5
• Rating 5
• 4. Achievement of Objectives Efficacy 5
• OBJECTIVE 1 5
• Objective 5
• Independent Evaluation Group IEG 6
• Rationale 6
• Theory of change. 6
• Outputs. 6
• Outcomes. 6
• Independent Evaluation Group IEG 7
• Rating 7
• OBJECTIVE 1 REVISION 1 7
• Revised Objective 7
• Revised Rationale 7
• Outputs. 7
• Outcomes. 7
• Revised Rating 7
• OBJECTIVE 2 7
• Independent Evaluation Group IEG 8
• Objective 8
• Rationale 8
• Theory of change. 8
• Outputs. 8
• Outcomes. 8
• Rating 8
• Independent Evaluation Group IEG 9
• OBJECTIVE 2 REVISION 1 9
• Revised Objective 9
• Revised Rationale 9
• Revised Rating 9
• OVERALL EFFICACY 9
• Rationale 9
• Overall Efficacy Rating Primary Reason 9
• OVERALL EFFICACY REVISION 1 9
• Overall Efficacy Revision 1 Rationale 9
• Overall Efficacy Revision 1 Rating 9
• 5. Efficiency 9
• Independent Evaluation Group IEG 10
• Economic analysis 10
• Administrative and operational Issues during implementation. 10
• Efficiency Rating 10
• Rate Available Point value CoverageScope 10
• Independent Evaluation Group IEG 11
• 6. Outcome 11
• Table Overall Outcome Rating 11
• Rating Dimension Original Scope Revised Scope 11
• Outcome Rating 11
• 7. Risk to Development Outcome 11
• Technical Risk 11
• Independent Evaluation Group IEG 12
• Government commitment 12
• 8. Assessment of Bank Performance 12
• Quality-at-Entry Rating 12
• Independent Evaluation Group IEG 13
• Quality of Supervision Rating 13
• Overall Bank Performance Rating 13
• 9. ME Design Implementation Utilization 13
• Independent Evaluation Group IEG 14
• ME Quality Rating 14
• 10. Other Issues 14
• Environmental Assessment Natural Habitats Forests and Physical Cultural Resources. 14
• Independent Evaluation Group IEG 15
• Indigenous Peoples IP 15
• Involuntary Resettlement. 15
• Financial Assessment FA 15
• Procurement Assessment 15
• Independent Evaluation Group IEG 16
• 11. Ratings 16
• Ratings ICR IEG Reason for DisagreementsComment 16
• 12. Lessons 16
• 1. Preparation of necessary technical studies for major transport infrastructure investments at design would help in minimizing implementation delays 16
• 2. Allocation of Bank financing could help in ensuring that capacity building activities are carried out in countries with implementation capacity constraints. 16
• Independent Evaluation Group IEG 17
• 3. Adopting timely actions for addressing the situation can help in countries with capacity constraints. 17
• 13. Assessment Recommended 17
• 14. Comments on Quality of ICR 17