cover image: Adapting to Misspecification

Adapting to Misspecification

5 Sep 2024

Empirical research typically involves a robustness-efficiency tradeoff. A researcher seeking to estimate a scalar parameter can invoke strong assumptions to motivate a restricted estimator that is precise but may be heavily biased, or they can relax some of these assumptions to motivate a more robust, but variable, unrestricted estimator. When a bound on the bias of the restricted estimator is available, it is optimal to shrink the unrestricted estimator towards the restricted estimator. For settings where a bound on the bias of the restricted estimator is unknown, we propose adaptive estimators that minimize the percentage increase in worst case risk relative to an oracle that knows the bound. We show that adaptive estimators solve a weighted convex minimax problem and provide lookup tables facilitating their rapid computation. Revisiting some well known empirical studies where questions of model specification arise, we examine the advantages of adapting to—rather than testing for—misspecification.
econometrics industrial organization public economics estimation methods economics of education economic fluctuations and growth labor studies technical working papers

Authors

Timothy Armstrong, Patrick M. Kline, Liyang Sun

Related Organizations

Acknowledgements & Disclosure
Timothy Armstrong gratefully acknowledges support from National Science Foundation Grant SES-2049765. Liyang Sun gratefully acknowledges support from the Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education, through Grant R305D200010, and Ayudas Juan de la Cierva Formacion. The views expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Bureau of Economic Research.
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3386/w32906
Pages
65
Published in
United States of America

Table of Contents

Related Topics

All