cover image: Zero Settlement Risk Token Systems

Zero Settlement Risk Token Systems

26 Sep 2024

If a token system permits programs with delayed exe- cution, or a transfer is programmed to occur conditional on reaching a future state, then agents can unilaterally transfer assets away from the accounts specified in the program in the gap that occurs between the time that a program is created, and the time at which a transfer instruction is recognized by the system. [...] When and if conditions are met, the bookkeeper applies the transformation φ ∈ Φ to the ledger `.10 The benefit from using a schedule is to delay the timing at which a bookkeeper gains access to private information on the ledger. [...] Trader A can use a schedule σ that delays the commitment of the program to date t, which postpones the timing at which the bookkeeper learns about the details of the instructions. [...] Intuitively, we can think of the bookkeeper having access to a machine that answers truthfully questions of the type “is the asset in account k at date (and state) t?” The bookkeeper does not know the entire state of the ledger and the information available is restricted to the information necessary to verify that a schedule is met. [...] At the time of settlement, the seller submits a program containing instructions to the book- keeper (in the form of a transformation) that specifies that the asset be moved from the seller’s account to the buyer’s account.
tokenization, programmability, settlement risk, financial architecture

Authors

Michael Junho Lee, Antoine Martin, and Robert M. Townsend

Related Organizations

Pages
31
Published in
United States of America

Table of Contents