Authors
Related Organizations
- Disclosure Date
- 2024/10/02
- Disclosure Status
- Disclosed
- Doc Name
- Honduras - Honduras Cat DDO
- Lending Instrument
- Development Policy Lending
- Originating Unit
- Urban LCR (ILCUR)
- Pages
- 18
- Product Line
- IBRD/IDA
- Published in
- United States of America
- Rel Proj ID
- HN-Honduras Drm Development Policy Credit With A Catastrophe Defer -- P172567
- TF No/Name
- TF0B1481-Strengthening Disaster Risk Management and Resilience Policy Frameworks
- Unit Owning
- Urban LCR (ILCUR)
- Version Type
- Final
Table of Contents
- Independent Evaluation Group IEG 1
- 1. Operation Information 1
- Operation ID Operation Name 1
- Country Practice Area Lead 1
- Non-Programmatic DPF 1
- LCTF Numbers Closing Date Original Total Financing USD 1
- Bank Approval Date Closing Date Actual 1
- IBRDIDA USD Co-financing USD 1
- Prepared by Reviewed by ICR Review Coordinator Group 1
- 2. Program Objectives and PillarsPolicy Areas 1
- DEVOBJTBL a. Objectives 1
- Independent Evaluation Group IEG 2
- Program Cost. 2
- Financing. 2
- Dates. 2
- 3. Relevance of Design 2
- Country Context. 2
- Relevance to Government Strategies. 2
- Independent Evaluation Group IEG 3
- Relevance to the World Banks Assistance Strategies. 3
- Rationale 3
- Pillar A Improving public financial management and fiscal resilience against disaster risk. 3
- Prior Action PA 1 as evidenced by 3
- Pillar B Enhancing the institutional framework for improved DRM. 3
- Independent Evaluation Group IEG 4
- PA 2 as evidenced by 4
- PA 3 as evidenced by 4
- Independent Evaluation Group IEG 5
- Pillar C Strengthening health emergency preparedness and response capacities. 5
- PA 4 as evidenced by 5
- PA 5 as evidenced by 5
- Pillar D Enhancing water resources governance and climate resilience. 5
- Independent Evaluation Group IEG 6
- PA 6 as evidenced by 6
- Rating 6
- 4. Relevance of Results Indicators 6
- Rationale 6
- Pillar A Improving public financial management and fiscal resilience against disaster risk. 6
- Results Indicator RI 1 6
- Independent Evaluation Group IEG 7
- Pillar B Enhancing the institutional framework for improved DRM. 7
- RI 2 7
- RI 3 7
- Pillar C Strengthening health emergency preparedness and response capacities. 7
- RI 4 7
- RI 5 7
- Pillar D Enhancing water resources governance and climate resilience. 7
- Independent Evaluation Group IEG 8
- RI 6a 8
- RI 6b 8
- Table 1. Results Indicators RIs the Prior Actions PAs baseline target values actual change in RI relative to target and RI achievement rating. 8
- Independent Evaluation Group IEG 9
- Independent Evaluation Group IEG 10
- Rating 10
- 5. Achievement of Objectives Efficacy 10
- Independent Evaluation Group IEG 11
- Objective 11
- Rationale 11
- Theory of Change ToC 11
- RI 1 11
- Independent Evaluation Group IEG 12
- RI 2 12
- RI 3 12
- RI 4 12
- RI 5 12
- Independent Evaluation Group IEG 13
- RI 6a 13
- RI 6b 13
- Rating 13
- Overall Achievement of Objectives Efficacy Rationale 13
- Overall Efficacy Rating 13
- Independent Evaluation Group IEG 14
- 6. Outcome 14
- Rationale 14
- 7. Risk to Development Outcome 14
- Political risk. 14
- Institutional capacity risk. 14
- Government commitment risk. 14
- 8. Assessment of Bank Performance 14
- Rationale 14
- Independent Evaluation Group IEG 15
- Rating 15
- Rationale 15
- Rating 15
- Independent Evaluation Group IEG 16
- Rationale 16
- Overall Bank Performance Rating 16
- 9. Other Impacts 16
- Social and Poverty 16
- Environmental 16
- Gender 16
- 10. Quality of ICR 16
- Rationale 16
- Independent Evaluation Group IEG 17
- 11. Ratings 17
- Ratings ICR IEG Reason for DisagreementComments 17
- 12. Lessons 17
- The full withdrawal of the Cat DDO funds early in implementation may limit the Cat DDOs potential to support countries to respond to multiple emergencies during implementation. 17
- Independent Evaluation Group IEG 18
- Government transitions such as the one following the November 2021 national elections can significantly affect the implementation of sector reforms. 18
- Maintaining close dialogue with a new government following elections is crucial to mitigate risks to project implementation and the achievement of result indicators. 18
- 13. Project Performance Assessment Report PPAR Recommended 18
