cover image: Gendered patterns of severe and multiple disadvantage in England

20.500.12592/ckbbsx

Gendered patterns of severe and multiple disadvantage in England

2 Feb 2020

No primary disadvantage, high secondary have never experienced any experienced one of the primary who have experienced disadvantage of the primary disadvantage disadvantages (either poor combinations of two or even domains, and together mental health or experience three primary domains but are make up a total of 46% of violence and abuse) but are not highly disadvantaged in of women in the private. [...] Poverty is however a core feature Importantly, this analysis has cast light on gender in the lives of around 7% of women (Clusters 8 and 10) and differences in the way aspects of disadvantage coalesce: 5% of men (Cluster 10) in the private household population it highlights the prevalence of experience of violence, and who are affected by a combination of significant primary and abuse and poor men. [...] 0% White-Brit Female Male Other UK born Not UK born A total of 21% of women and 18% of men are somewhat more common in the most without experience of primary domains of deprived groups affected by more complex disadvantage (No PD) were born overseas; by levels of disadvantage (PD2-4, depriv), contrast this was true of only 9% of women representing 14% of women and 18% of men. [...] experiencing more complex combinations of primary and secondary disadvantage (PD2-4, depriv), the majority of men and women are in social renting, with very few home owning (12% of women, 11% of men) and very sizeable numbers in the private rented sector (a third of both women and men). [...] Figure 9.1 further shows the gap in the likelihood However, the analysis in Chapter of living in poverty between men and women who have experienced the most complex 5 also showed that there are a combinations of primary and secondary considerable number of women disadvantage (PD2-4, depriv) and those who have not experienced any primary domains of and men in the private household disadvantage in a.
Pages
83
Published in
United Kingdom

Tables