Evaluation study on excellent science in the European framework programmes for research and innovation :Annex 7.1 : survey questionnaires : phase 2 : supporting the interim evaluation of Horizon Europe

Table of Contents

• Evaluation study on Excellent 1
• Science in the European 1
• Framework Programmes for 1
• Research and Innovation 1
• Evaluation study on Excellent 3
• Science in the European 3
• Framework Programmes for 3
• Research and Innovation 3
• Table of Contents 4
• 1. Survey of the Horizon Europe MSCA beneficiary researchers participating in Postdoctoral Fellowships Doctoral Networks Staff 5
• Exchanges and COFUND 5
• Introduction 6
• Background information 7
• Efficiency 48
• Coherencesynergies 63
• Relevance 67
• Obstacles and challenges encountered during Horizon Europe project 86
• EU-Added value 93
• 2. Survey of the Horizon Europe ERC Principal Investigators PIs 99
• Introduction 100
• Efficiency 139
• Coherencesynergies 155
• Relevance 159
• Effectiveness 165
• Obstacles and challenges encountered during Horizon Europe project 179
• Ethics appraisal processes 185
• EU-Added value 187
• Concluding remarks 192
• 3. Survey of unsuccessful applicants to Horizon Europe MSCA 193
• Postdoctoral fellowships and ERC 193
• Introduction 194
• Background information 195
• Efficiency 224
• RelevanceMotivation to apply 229
• Project scope 240
• Research methods 240
• Research outputs 241
• Duration 241
• Research conditions 241
• Concluding remarks 244
• 4. Survey of successful applicant organisations survey MSCA Research 245
• Infrastructures Global Challenges European Industrial 245
• Competitiveness Cluster 1-4 WIDERA 245
• Introduction 246
• Background information 247
• Efficiency 260
• Coherencesynergies 279
• Relevancemotivation to apply 283
• Effectiveness 290
• Outcome expected results and impacts 291
• Barriers and success factors 301
• Dissemination exploitation and communication of results 306
• Ethics appraisal processes 314
• EU-Added value 315
• Concluding remarks 320
• 5. Survey of beneficiary organisations under the Horizon Europe Pillar II 321
• Cluster 5 and Cluster 6 programme parts 321
• Introduction 322
• Background information 323
• Efficiency 336
• Coherencesynergies 356
• Relevancemotivation to apply 360
• Effectiveness 367
• Outcome expected results and impacts 368
• Contribution to a green transition 378
• Barriers and success factors 395
• Dissemination exploitation and communication of results 401
• Ethics appraisal processes 409
• EU-Added value 410
• Concluding remarks 414
• 6. Survey of beneficiary organisations under the Horizon Europe Pillar III 416
• European Innovation Council Pathfinder and Transition grants 416
• Introduction 417
• Background information 418
• Efficiency 432
• Coherencesynergies 451
• Relevancemotivation to apply 455
• Effectiveness 462
• Outcome expected results and impacts 463
• Barriers and success factors 472
• Ethics appraisal processes 485
• EU-Added value 487
• 7. Survey of European Innovation Council EIC Accelerator beneficiaries 493
• Introduction 494
• Background information 495
• Efficiency 509
• Granting procedure 514
• Flexibility in implementation 515
• Project reporting 516
• Financial management 518
• Coherencesynergies 527
• Relevancemotivation to apply 531
• Effectiveness 534
• Expected results and impacts 538
• Barriers and success factors 540
• Logic Showhide trigger exists. 542
• Dissemination exploitation and communication of results 544
• Ethics appraisal processes 551
• EU-Added value 552
• Concluding remarks 556
• 8. Survey of unsuccessful applicant organisations survey MSCA Doctoral 557
• Networks Staff Exchanges and COFUND Research Infrastructures 557
• Global Challenges European Industrial Competitiveness Clusters 1-6 557
• EIE EIC Transition and Pathways WIDERA 557
• Introduction 558
• Background information 559
• Efficiency 573
• RelevanceMotivation to apply 579
• Information about the developments following unsuccessful project application 586
• Concluding remarks 596
• 9. Survey of unsuccessful applicants to Horizon Europe Pillar III European 597
• Innovation Council EIC Accelerator grants 597
• Introduction 598
• Background information 599
• Efficiency 613
• RelevanceMotivation to apply 619
• Information about the developments following unsuccessful project application 620
• Project scope 625
• Methods 625
• Research outputs 626
• Duration 626
• Partner numbers 626
• Partner profiles 627
• Concluding remarks 630