This paper examines how booms and busts in peer-to-peer (P2P) lending in the People’s Republic of China (PRC) affect monetary policy transmission to inflation and output.
Authors
- DOI
- http://dx.doi.org/10.22617/WPS240494-2
- Dimensions
- 8.5x11
- ISSN
- 2313-6537(print) 2313-6545(PDF)
- Pages
- 36
- Published in
- Philippines
- SKU
- WPS240494-2
- pages
- 34
Table of Contents
- Abstract 4
- 1. Introduction 5
- 2. Data and empirical methodology 10
- 2.1 Identification of unanticipated changes in monetary policy 11
- 2.2 Data 14
- 2.3 Econometric methodology 14
- 2.4 Definition of the P2P lending market states 16
- 3. Empirical results 17
- 3.1 Macroeconomic effects of unanticipated changes in monetary policy 17
- 3.2 Responses of P2P lending markets to unanticipated monetary policy changes 18
- 3.3 State-dependent effects of unanticipated monetary policy changes 21
- 3.4 Robustness 23
- 3.4.1 Alternative measure of unanticipated monetary policy changes 23
- 3.4.2 Alternative measure of the P2P lending market states 25
- 4. Conclusions 29
- Appendix 31
- A.1 Data definitions and sources 31
- A.2 P2P lending in selected Asian economies 32
- References 33
- Figures 6
- 1: Trends in P2P Lending Market Share in the People’s Republic of China 6
- 2: Monthly Series of Unanticipated Monetary Policy Changes 13
- 3: Impulse Responses of Macroeconomic Variables to an Unexpected Contractionary Monetary Policy Change 17
- 4: Impulse Responses of P2P Lending Market Variables to an Unexpected Contractionary Monetary Policy Change 20
- 5: State-Dependent Impulse Responses to an Unexpected Contractionary Monetary Policy Change 22
- 6: State-Dependent Impulse Responses to an Unexpected Contractionary Monetary Policy Change: Narrative-Based Monetary Policy Indexes 24
- 7: State-Dependent Impulse Responses to an Unexpected Contractionary Monetary Policy Change: Alternative State Variable of P2P Lending Market 26
- 8: State-Dependent Impulse Responses to an Unexpected Contractionary Monetary Policy Change: Conditioning on Economic Policy Uncertainty 28