Authors
- Disclosure Date
- 2024/11/11
- Disclosure Status
- Disclosed
- Doc Name
- China - Lushan Earthquake Reconstruction Project
- Lending Instrument
- Investment Project Financing
- Pages
- 22
- Product Line
- IBRD/IDA
- Published in
- United States of America
- Rel Proj ID
- CN-Lushan Earthquake Reconstruction And Risk Reduction Project-135 -- P153548
- Unit Owning
- INF-EAP-Urban 2 (IEAU2)
- Version Type
- Final
Table of Contents
- Independent Evaluation Group IEG 1
- 1. Project Data 1
- Project ID Project Name 1
- Country Practice AreaLead 1
- LCTF Numbers Closing Date Original Total Project Cost USD 1
- Bank Approval Date Closing Date Actual 1
- IBRDIDA USD Grants USD 1
- Prepared by Reviewed by ICR Review Coordinator Group 1
- 2. Project Objectives and Components 1
- DEVOBJTBL a. Objectives 1
- Independent Evaluation Group IEG 2
- Did the Board approve the revised objectiveskey associated outcome targets 2
- Upgrading and Risk Reduction of Rural Roads 2
- Upgrading of Priority Urban and Emergency Infrastructure 2
- Independent Evaluation Group IEG 3
- Technical Assistance for Strengthening of Disaster Management and Preparedness in Shimian County later 3
- Project Management and Capacity Building 3
- Project Cost 3
- Financing 3
- Borrower Contribution 3
- Dates 3
- Independent Evaluation Group IEG 4
- Split Rating 4
- 3. Relevance of Objectives 4
- Rationale 4
- Context 4
- Country Plans . 4
- Independent Evaluation Group IEG 5
- World Bank Country Partnership Framework 5
- World Bank Experience in the Sector and in the Country 5
- High 5
- Independent Evaluation Group IEG 6
- Rating 6
- 4. Achievement of Objectives Efficacy 6
- Objective 6
- Rationale 6
- THEORY OF CHANGE 6
- CRITICAL ASSUMPTIONS 6
- OUTPUTS 6
- Independent Evaluation Group IEG 7
- OUTCOMES 7
- Independent Evaluation Group IEG 8
- Substantial 8
- Rating 8
- Objective 8
- Rationale 8
- THEORY OF CHANGE 8
- Independent Evaluation Group IEG 9
- OUTPUTS 9
- Independent Evaluation Group IEG 10
- OUTCOMES 10
- Independent Evaluation Group IEG 11
- Independent Evaluation Group IEG 12
- Substantial 12
- Rating 12
- Rationale 12
- Substantial . 12
- Overall Efficacy Rating 12
- 5. Efficiency 12
- Economic and Financial Efficiency 12
- Independent Evaluation Group IEG 13
- Administrative and Operational Efficiency 13
- Independent Evaluation Group IEG 14
- Substantial 14
- Efficiency Rating 14
- Rate Available Point value CoverageScope 14
- 6. Outcome 14
- Outcome Rating 14
- 7. Risk to Development Outcome 14
- Environmental risks and risks from natural hazards 14
- Independent Evaluation Group IEG 15
- Technical risk 15
- Government ownership or commitment risks 15
- Social risk 15
- Governance Risk 15
- 8. Assessment of Bank Performance 15
- Independent Evaluation Group IEG 16
- Satisfactory. 16
- Quality-at-Entry Rating 16
- Independent Evaluation Group IEG 17
- Satisfactory. 17
- Satisfactory. . 17
- Quality of Supervision Rating 17
- Overall Bank Performance Rating 17
- 9. ME Design Implementation Utilization 17
- Independent Evaluation Group IEG 18
- Substantial 18
- ME Quality Rating 18
- Independent Evaluation Group IEG 19
- 10. Other Issues 19
- Environmental safeguards. 19
- Social safeguards. 19
- Financial Management. 19
- Independent Evaluation Group IEG 20
- Procurement. 20
- 11. Ratings 20
- Ratings ICR IEG Reason for DisagreementsComment 20
- 12. Lessons 20
- Independent Evaluation Group IEG 21
- If standards for disaster resilient infrastructure incorporated community concerns to design these standards adherence may be better implemented. 21
- Independent Evaluation Group IEG 22
- 13. Assessment Recommended 22
- 14. Comments on Quality of ICR 22
