Bill 194

In the coming months, the provincial government should prioritize the development of the most important AI regulations and policies, such as the provincial risk assessment framework, prohibitions, an impact assessment tool, and governance structure. [...] AI systems such as predictive policing, biometric surveillance systems, and bail and sentencing risk assessment algorithms have demonstrably high risks to Charter rights, human rights, privacy, and procedural fairness.14 The risks of AI systems used in the criminal justice system, courts, and tribunals was discussed at length in the LCO’s Accountable AI and The Rise and Fall of Algorithms in the A. [...] The purpose of an AI registry is to centralize disclosure of AI and ADM systems, promote public and legal accountability, and to be a resource for developers, stakeholders, researchers, and the public. [...] The growth in the use and development of AIAs and HRIAs is a proactive response to the many documented risks of private and public AI to equality, fairness, privacy, transparency, and data security.29 AIAs and HRIAs are structured questionnaires that guide developers, operators, and institutions through a comprehensive checklist of issues and questions to assess an AI system against specified and. [...] The European Commission will also establish an AI board, an advisory forum, and a Scientific Panel of independent experts.59 Under the EU AI Act, enforcement and sanctions depend on the type of AI and the scope the AI regulations fall into.60 The Commission has the exclusive authority to oversee and enforce rules related to general-purpose AI models and their providers (article 88).61 In the U.