If the UK is to be a “science superpower”, we need to rethink our strategy for
science.
Since the 1980s, UK science policy has adhered to a model of science that is
mostly organised at arm’s length, driven by curiosity, and disproportionately
funded by taxpayers. It is a model that has generated a broader and deeper
science base than any comparably sized nation, as evidenced by the weight of
Nobel Prizes, Fields Medals, highly-cited papers and world-leading universities.
The UK’s science system is without doubt one of the UK’s greatest national
strengths.
It is also an asset that we could exploit more effectively. Within the term “science
superpower” lies not only a desire to create knowledge but an intent to mobilise it
in the UK’s interest. This might mean “hard” or “soft” power. It might be directed
towards economic, technological or military ends. It might be in response to
biological, environmental or security threats. But it necessarily requires
policymakers to treat scientific knowledge, networks and institutions not just as
public goods but as national capabilities in an increasingly competitive and
threatening world.
The question is how the UK can adopt such a posture without undermining
excellence elsewhere. This reports sets out some arguments as to how this could be done.
Authors
- Published in
- United Kingdom