NOTICE OF EXEMPT SOLICITATION

The proposal asks Amazon’s Board of Directors to: Commission an independent, third-party assessment of Amazon’s adherence to its stated commitment to workers’ freedom of association and collective bargaining rights as outlined in Amazon’s Global Human Rights Principles, which explicitly reference the Core Conventions of the International Labour Organization and the ILO Declaration on Fundamental P. [...] Summing up the contributions in the issue the editor note: The Editor's note, sums up the message of the articles: "…the law conceives of a captive audience as an affront to human dignity, of the right to be treated as an autonomous adult, not a child in tutelage to one’s employer, subject to its instruction on political or social subjects including unionization.” 18 ILO Committee on Freedom of As. [...] A Third-Party Assessment of Amazon’s Adherence to International Labor Rights Standards Could Reduce Legal, Reputational, and Operational Risks An independent third-party Assessment of Amazon’s compliance with its own commitment to respect international standards would help inform the Company’s management, the Board of Directors, and shareholders about the merits of its human rights approach and co. [...] The policy or report in question does not address the substance of the proposal as the document does not assess how Amazon’s conduct aligns with its stated commitment to workers’ freedom of association and collective bargaining rights and the ILO Declaration and Core Conventions to which it claims adherence. [...] 4.3 A Third-Party Assessment Should Focus on Amazon’s Compliance with the Principle of Noninterference at the Heart of ILO Conventions 87 and 98 An independent, third-party Assessment of Amazon’s adherence to its stated commitment to workers’ freedom of association and collective bargaining rights would focus on the Company’s compliance with the principle of noninterference at the heart of ILO Con.