Policy Brief: - Prospects for AI Regulation

activity that doesn’t have a thing to do with what’s gonna bombard us from outside.” Altman agreed with the need to address global scope for AI regulation, suggesting that the international model could follow the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), the intergovernmental organization that promotes the peaceful use of nuclear energy. [...] However, while the US and EU have made general agreements to collaborate on responsible AI development, there has been little movement in the way of international forums that include large players like China, which has laid out some of the most restrictive AI measures—and which may strongly oppose US interests and values in both the use and regulation of AI. [...] AI and Copyright The House hearing in the Judiciary Committee’s Subcommittee on Courts, Intellectual Property, and the Internet focused on how copyright law should apply to the materials feeding input to AI systems, most of which are subject to copyright. [...] Finally, leading AI developers have agreed to a public evaluation of their systems at the AI Village during the DEFCON 31 hackers’ conference for conformity with the AI Risk Management Framework of the Commerce Department’s National Institute of Standards and Technology. [...] But the US remains behind other jurisdictions in assessing the regulatory steps that it wishes to take, in contrast to the more comprehensive approach that the EU has taken in areas including online privacy, data security, and the ability of consumers to control their online data.