The goal of this step is to monitor the project’s effectiveness at creating change in the identified outcome and intervening variables, and to make modifications to the project, if needed, based on information gained throughout the evaluation process. [...] Coalition developed an evaluation team made up of coalition members, members of the focus population, evaluator(s) (if applicable), and other key stakeholders in the community Coalition engages members in discussion around specific obstacles to using information from the evaluation results within the coalition (e.g., concern about the time and effort involved, dysfunctional communication and i. [...] Analyzing and interpreting evaluation data: After designing an evaluation and collecting pertinent data, the information must be described, analyzed, interpreted, and a judgment made about the meaning of the findings in the context of the project. [...] Quantitative1 analysis is used to draw conclusions about the focus population and the impact the project has had on the population Analyzes the data so that the qualitative2 findings are clear, credible, and address the relevant and priority evaluation questions and issues Coalition discusses findings, including whether they make sense, potential biases and other limitations, explanations fo. [...] Evaluation procedures are agreed upon by evaluation team Evaluation procedures are agreed upon by the community to ensure equitable involvement of community members, thereby sharing decision making and ownership of the evaluation process Plans to carry out the evaluation are detailed (e.g., timeline, responsible parties, tasks) Any revisions to evaluation procedures or data collection acti.
Authors
- Pages
- 5
- Published in
- United States of America