The interactions at the heart of Missouri v. Biden implicate many speech interests: those of the platforms, independent entities researching misinformation, the government, and millions of platform users. A thoughtful First Amendment analysis would articulate a principled way of distinguishing legitimate government speech from illegitimate government coercion. The post Missouri v. Biden Raises More First Amendment Questions Than It Answers first appeared on Just Security. The post Missouri v...
Authors
- Published in
- United States of America
- Rights
- © Mayze Teitler