cover image: Test No. 442C: In Chemico Skin Sensitisation - Assays addressing the Adverse Outcome Pathway key event on covalent binding to proteins

20.500.12592/gkqxcf

Test No. 442C: In Chemico Skin Sensitisation - Assays addressing the Adverse Outcome Pathway key event on covalent binding to proteins

23 Jun 2022

Go to oecd.org
The term "test chemical" is used in this Test Guideline to refer to what is being tested1 and is not related to the applicability of the DPRA to the testing of substances and/or mixtures (see a summary of the known limitations of the DPRA in Annex 1 of this Appendix). [...] In the light of the above, negative results obtained with the test method should be interpreted in the context of the stated limitations and in the connection with other information sources within the framework of an IATA or a DA. [...] Since in the DPRA the test chemical is incubated in large excess with either the cysteine or the lysine peptides, visual inspection of the forming of a clear solution is considered sufficient to ascertain that the test chemical P(and all of its components in the case of testing a multi-constituent substance or aE mixture) is dissolved. [...] samples containing only the peptide dissolved in the appropriate solvent) should also be included in the HPLC run sequence and these are used to verify the HPLC systemD suitability prior to the analysis (reference controls A), the stability of the reference controls over time (reference control B) and to verify that the solvent used to dissolve the test chemical does not impact the percent peptide. [...] In the light of the above, negative results obtained with the test method should be interpreted in the context of the stated limitations and in the connection with other information sources within the framework of an IATA.

Authors

DELRUE Nathalie

Published in
France

Tables

All