cover image: Editors’ Overview

20.500.12592/8sf7r5v

Editors’ Overview

20 Dec 2023

Fi- formance in the sector led to greater price nally, the authors find that while lower increases than in the United States, with growth in the 2000-2019 period overall is a negative effect on the productivity of the largely attributable to much weaker mul- industries using the output of the informa- tifactor productivity growth, there was a tion and cultural services industry as in- pronounced s. [...] The authors make the case that lower INTERNATIONAL PRODUCTIVITY MONITOR 1 productivity growth and greater price in- In the fourth article in the symposium, creases in the sector in Canada reflects a Jonathan Barr, Peter Foltin and Jian- lower level of competition in this country min Tang from Innovation, Science and than in the United States. [...] In the sixth article, Pierre- The methodology is based on the theory of Alain Pionnier, Belén Zinni and Kéa the firm in terms of profit maximizing and Baret from the OECD examine the sen- price taking and is exogenous to productiv- sitivity of MFP estimates to the different ity shocks. [...] from the London School of Economics pro- Over the course of a business cycle, the vides a detailed discussion of how national INTERNATIONAL PRODUCTIVITY MONITOR 3 statistical offices in the United Kingdom, both Canada and the United States follow the United States, and Canada responded the OECD guidelines for the production of to the OECD guidelines. [...] In the EU and that within the OECD, the level of sup- the United Kingdom there is still some way port and take-up of the KLEMS approach to go as productivity statistics are still not taken up by national statistical offices has fully integrated into the national accounts.

Authors

Powered by John Tsang at CSLS 2018

Pages
4
Published in
Canada