The article by Pramod Khandekar and Prasanta Kumar Ghosh, ‘Bioeconomy: Different Countries, Different Strategies, Multiple Benefits’, gives an excellent account of the driving factors and components of bioeconomy in different countries that may have a determining impact on the development of the regions and on the kinds of technologies and industries coming up in the short, medium and long terms. [...] Bioeconomy: Different Countries, Different Strategies, Multiple Benefits Pramod Khandekar* and Prasanta Kumar Ghosh** Abstract: The steering and operative aspects and components of bioeconomy in different countries that may have a determining impact on the development of the regions and on the kinds of technologies and industries coming up in the short, medium and long terms have been discussed. [...] The EU economy is the joint economy of the member states and is the third largest economy in the world in nominal terms, after the United States and China. [...] The plan was to protect and intensify the use biological resources for the development of novel and useful goods and services in the areas of medicine, healthcare, agriculture, forestry, energy, environmental protection, materials and other linked sectors to promote bioeconomy and the action plans would show results by 2025. [...] There is yet no unified strategic document for the ASEAN countries to identify the technological gaps and barriers as also the best practices to be adopted for the region to address the challenges faced by the governments and the policymakers, the researchers and practitioners, including the industry for a successful bioeconomy for the region.
- Pages
- 128
- Published in
- India
