cover image: In the Supreme Court of the United States - BRIEF FOR FOOD AND DRUG LAW SCHOLARS AND PROFESSORS AS AMICI CURIAE

20.500.12592/x3ffhkn

In the Supreme Court of the United States - BRIEF FOR FOOD AND DRUG LAW SCHOLARS AND PROFESSORS AS AMICI CURIAE

30 Jan 2024

In specified circumstances, the FDCA authorizes FDA to impose distribution and use restrictions to assure that a drug’s benefits outweigh its risks, but the statute re- quires the Agency to minimize the burdens of such restrictions on patient access and, to the extent prac- ticable, the healthcare system. [...] § 355-1).5 FDA may impose a REMS only if the Agency determines that a REMS is “necessary to ensure that the benefits of the drug outweigh the risks of the drug.” 21 U. [...] They are appropriate only when necessary to ensure that the benefits of the drug outweigh the risks.6 ETASU must be “part of [a] strategy to mitigate a specific serious risk listed in the labeling of the drug” and must be “commensurate” with this risk. [...] Such data are to be used both to assess the effectiveness of the REMS and “the im- pact of the program on the healthcare delivery system and on patient access to the drug.” Id. [...] FDA “determined that the approved REMS for Mifeprex should be modified to continue to ensure that the benefits of Mifeprex out- weigh its risks and to minimize the burden on the healthcare delivery system of complying with the REMS.” J.

Authors

Braiterman, Beth

Pages
52
Published in
United States of America