precise definition and boundary of economic security is different depending on the state. In this sense, it could be said that the importance of the statement at

During the before such as the National Police Agency (NPA) and 2023 G7 meeting at Hiroshima, the G7 Leaders’ the Economic Unit of the National Security Statement on Economic Resilience and Economic Secretariat (NSS), the most suitable agency for that Security showcased this fact by highlighting the purpose would be the PSIA. [...] One of the the NPA, while it has the capability and manpower for limitations set by the act towards the PSIA is that it the role, law enforcement and intelligence gathering can only monitor and restrict organizational targets. [...] While the information gathered by the Prevention Act and the Act on the Control of PSIA is important, it also needs to be shared with the Organizations. [...] In general, the Japanese population has a significantly lower tolerance against the state strengthening public security compared to many other Western industrialized countries, partly due to the memories of the state using the Special Higher Police and military police to suppress freedom of speech before and during the Second World War. [...] The Japanese public and the opposition party focused on concerns regarding the people’s right to know, and very little time was allocated towards debating the specific types and nature of the intelligence that was the object of protection under the Act.