cover image: Submission to the Senate Economics References Committee Inquiry into improving consumer

20.500.12592/1vhhsns

Submission to the Senate Economics References Committee Inquiry into improving consumer

5 Mar 2024

The rationale for compulsory superannuation Changes to the system of compulsory superannuation need to recognise the reasons for that system. [...] A large part of the rationale for using superannuation for housing is that it helps achieve the objectives of the superannuation system, while avoiding some of the disadvantages. [...] The scheme would apply to both new and existing homes, with the invested amount to be returned to their superannuation fund when the house is sold, including a share of any capital gain. [...] Under the Coalition’s scheme, the buyer forgoes the earnings they would otherwise receive on their superannuation, whereas the Government’s scheme is a subsidy.3 Flowing from this, the Coalition scheme offers a moderate amount of assistance to a large number of home buyers, whereas the Government scheme provides large assistance to few buyers. [...] Whereas the Coalition is offering up to 40% of the superannuation balance (which might be $16,000 for a typical borrower), the Government is offering up to 40 per cent of the value of new homes and 30 per cent for existing homes.   The reduction in superannuation balances (by $10,734 in the central case discussed above) is a critical feature of the Coalition’s plan.

Authors

Peter Tulip

Pages
16
Published in
Australia