In the evaluator’s shoes: lessons from a participatory evaluation experiment

For more details on the arrangements for the experiment and the training programme, please refer to the appendices “Consultation of the CNLE’s 5th College and the citizens’ panel” in the three successive reports of the evaluation committee. [...] Interventions from the other hand, the value of having identical consultation actors implied in the territorial implementation of the Strategy formats, given the dierences in the nature of the two were preferred to presentations on the progress of the imple- groups, is subject to greater debate. [...] Table 1 — Examples of how the evaluation committee incorporated citizens’ opinions PROPOSALS MADE IN THE OPINIONS TAKEN INTO ACCOUNT OF THE TWO GROUPS IN THE COMMITTEE’S REPORTS OR POSITIONS STRENGTHENING THE VOICE OF THE EVALUATION COMMITTEE For the March 2020 progress note on the evaluation questions and the evaluation approach The citizens’ panel expressed the wish that the evaluation In monito. [...] For the March 2021 annual report on the implementation of the Strategy, the initial evaluation elements, the themes of interest or priorities in the fight against poverty The citizens’ panel called for a dashboard in the form of a In its recommendation 3, the evaluation committee took up timeline showing the measures implemented, the this request and called for the provision of a dashboard amounts. [...] ENHANCING THE REFLECTIONS OF THE EVALUATION COMMITTEE For the July 2022 annual report on the implementation of the Strategy, available evaluation data and guidelines In their opinion, the members of the 5th College stressed This request was reflected in recommendation 12 of the the need to take account of certain specific groups evaluation committee’s report on taking account of the (people leavin.