cover image: Re-assessing the Spatial Mismatch Hypothesis

20.500.12592/9ghx8ms

Re-assessing the Spatial Mismatch Hypothesis

14 Mar 2024

We use detailed location information from the Longitudinal Employer-Household Dynamics (LEHD) database to develop new evidence on the effects of spatial mismatch on the relative earnings of Black workers in large US cities. We classify workplaces by the size of the pay premiums they offer in a two-way fixed effects model, providing a simple metric for defining “good” jobs. We show that: (a) Black workers earn nearly the same average wage premiums as whites; (b) in most cities Black workers live closer to jobs, and closer to good jobs, than do whites; (c) Black workers typically commute shorter distances than whites; and (d) people who commute further earn higher average pay premiums, but the elasticity with respect to distance traveled is slightly lower for Black workers. We conclude that geographic proximity to good jobs is unlikely to be a major source of the racial earnings gaps in major U.S. cities today.
labor compensation labor economics labor studies regional and urban economics

Authors

David Card, Jesse Rothstein, Moises Yi

Acknowledgements & Disclosure
We thank Richard Jin and Nicole Gandre for excellent research assistance and Ellora Derenoncourt, Patrick Kline, and Stephen Ross for valuable comments. We thank Open Philanthropy for research support. Any opinions and conclusions expressed herein are those of the authors and do not represent the views of the U.S. Census Bureau. The Census Bureau has ensured appropriate access and use of confidential data and has reviewed these results for disclosure avoidance (Project 6000266: CBDRB‐FY24‐CES024-001/002). The views expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Bureau of Economic Research.
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3386/w32252
Published in
United States of America