President’s Message 3 Spring is Here 3 Announcements 4

In determining which research projects are sensitive, the report advised that NSF should consider the sensitivity of potential applications for the research and the “technology readiness level” (i.e., how far along the technology is in development), and it should then use this information to assess the “direct and predictable national security impact of the applications” of each research proposal. [...] International collaborations with others that “share the ideals or openness and transparency” are beneficial, but the current efforts of the PRC to direct the results of fundamental research to military efforts and restrict the outward flow of information “may severely limit the benefits of collaborations with research organizations within the PRC.” • Fundamental Research and CUI: Fundamental rese. [...] If the PI determines that a project is potentially sensitive, then the PI would provide details on the intended use of research results, technology readiness level at the beginning and end of the project, and any features of the technology under research that “create national security impact beyond that of technology already discussed in the open literature. [...] While the new rule recognizes that fundamental research does not fall within the scope of the CMMC program, the associations expressed the need for additional clarifications to avoid the inappropriate application of CMMC to fundamental research. [...] In addition to the critical issue of the treatment of fundamental research, the letter made the following points: • The importance of integrating prior DoD guidance on CUI designation and marking into the program regulations to improve the ability of DoD contract officers to work effectively with researchers and institutions in ensuring that CMMC Program requirements are only applied as appropriat.