cover image: Marginal Returns to Public Universities

20.500.12592/tdz0fwb

Marginal Returns to Public Universities

4 Apr 2024

This paper studies the causal impacts of public universities on the outcomes of their marginally admitted students. I use administrative admission records spanning all 35 public universities in Texas, which collectively enroll 10 percent of American public university students, to systematically identify and employ decentralized cutoffs in SAT/ACT scores that generate discontinuities in admission and enrollment. The typical marginally admitted student completes an additional year of education in the four-year sector, is 12 percentage points more likely to earn a bachelor's degree, and eventually earns 5-10 percent more than their marginally rejected but otherwise identical counterpart. Marginally admitted students pay no additional tuition costs thanks to offsetting grant aid; cost-benefit calculations show internal rates of return of 19-23 percent for the marginal students themselves, 10-12 percent for society (which must pay for the additional education), and 3-4 percent for the government budget. Finally, I develop a method to disentangle separate effects for students on the extensive margin of the four-year sector versus those who would fall back to another four-year school if rejected. Substantially larger extensive margin effects drive the results.
education children public goods public economics labor compensation economics of education labor economics labor studies labor supply and demand health, education, and welfare subnational fiscal issues

Authors

Jack Mountjoy

Acknowledgements & Disclosure
For helpful comments and conversations, I am grateful to Marianne Bertrand, Dan Black, Chris Campos, Raj Chetty, Jeff Denning, Michael Dinerstein, Lancelot Henry de Frahan, Michael Galperin, Luis Garicano, Owen Graham-O'Regan, Emily Leslie, Jonathan Meer, Magne Mogstad, Dick Murnane, Rich Murphy, Derek Neal, Matt Notowidigdo, Amanda Pallais, Canice Prendergast, Michael Ricks, Evan Rose, Jon Roth, Jesse Shapiro, Doug Staiger, Alex Torgovitsky, Cody Tuttle, Chris Walters, and seminar participants at the University of Maryland, University of Chicago, Texas A&M, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, University of Toronto, and UT-Austin. I am also grateful for the expertise of the UT-Dallas Education Research Center staff, especially Holly Kosiewicz, Mark Lu, Trey Miller, and the tragically departed Rodney Andrews. The Robert H. Topel Faculty Research Fund at the University of Chicago Booth School of Business provided valuable research funding. The conclusions of this research do not necessarily reflect the opinions or official position of the Texas Education Research Center, the Texas Education Agency, the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board, the Texas Workforce Commission, or the State of Texas. The views expressed herein are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Bureau of Economic Research.
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3386/w32296
Published in
United States of America

Related Topics

All