Authors
Directorate-General for Internal Policies of the Union, European Parliament, Brunello, Silvia, Gay-Berthomieu, Magali, Smiles, Beth, Bardho, Eneidia, Schantz, Clémence, Rozee, Virginie
- Catalogue number
- QA-09-24-523-EN-N QA-09-24-523-EN-C
- Citation
- European Parliament, Directorate-General for Internal Policies of the Union, Brunello, S., Gay-Berthomieu, M., Smiles, B. et al., Obstetric and gynaecological violence in the EU – Prevalence, legal frameworks and educational guidelines for prevention and elimination , European Parliament, 2024, https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2861/32832
- DOI
- https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2861/386093 https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2861/32832
- ISBN
- 978-92-848-1969-0
- Pages
- 205
- Published in
- Belgium
- Themes
- Health policy , Fundamental rights
Table of Contents
- List of Abbreviations 8
- The Health and Social Care Inspectorate 8
- LIST OF BOXES 10
- LIST OF TABLES 10
- EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 11
- 1. INTRODUCTION 13
- 1.1. Methodology 13
- 1.2. Key challenges in collecting and analysing the data 13
- 1.3. Structure of the study 14
- 2. UNDERSTANDING OBSTETRIC AND GYNAECOLOGICAL VIOLENCE 15
- 2.1. Defining obstetric and gynaecological violence 15
- 2.1.1. A violence that occurs at the intersection of two structural issues 17
- a. The medicalisation of women’s bodies as an historical product of modern medicine 17
- b. Structural issues of the healthcare system, a breeding ground for violence 18
- 2.1.2. Consequences of obstetric and gynaecological violence 19
- 2.2. International and European legal and policy framework recognising obstetric and gynaecological violence 21
- 2.2.1. International framework 21
- 2.2.2. European framework 22
- 3. MEASURING OBSTETRIC AND GYNAECOLOGICAL VIOLENCE IN THE EUROPEAN UNION 23
- 3.1. Prevalence51F of obstetric and gynaecological violence across the 27 EU Member States 23
- 3.1.1. Data collected reveals widespread forms of violence 23
- 3.1.2. Limited data on prevalence rates of gynaecological violence 34
- 3.2. Understanding women’s experiences through qualitative research 35
- 3.3. The impact of institutional structures on prevalence of obstetric and gynaecological violence 36
- 3.4. The impact of COVID-19 on prevalence of obstetric and gynaecological violence 37
- 3.5. Adopting an intersectional approach to identify women most at risk 39
- 4. PUBLIC AWARENESS AND ATTITUDES TOWARDS OBSTETRIC AND GYNAECOLOGICAL VIOLENCE 45
- 4.1. Initiatives to raise awareness on the issue have been identified in the majority of EU 27 Member States 45
- 4.2. Initiatives to collect women’s voices have emerged on social media 49
- 4.3. Alternative spaces to support women in understanding and denouncing this violence 51
- 4.4. Initiatives emerging from healthcare professionals 52
- 4.5. Impact of those initiatives on media 53
- 5. LEGAL AND POLICY RESPONSES TO OBSTETRIC AND GYNAECOLOGICAL VIOLENCE 56
- 5.1. Applicable legal framework to obstetric and gynaecological violence in EU Member States 56
- 5.2. Towards a better recognition at Member State level 63
- 5.2.1. Legislative proposals to legally frame the issue 63
- 5.2.2. Policy developments 65
- a. Strategic documents on gender equality 65
- b. Initiatives promoted by decision-making institutions to better understand the issues 68
- c. Health-related policy documents and guidelines 71
- 6. IMPROVING ACCESS TO JUSTICE 73
- 6.1. Existing mechanisms at Member State level 73
- 6.1.1. Judicial avenues: civil and criminal proceedings 73
- 6.1.2. Extra-judicial avenues 74
- a. Filing a grievance with the hospital 74
- b. File a complaint with the healthcare system344F 74
- c. Disciplinary proceedings before the medical board, the board of gynaecologists, or midwives347F 75
- d. Compensation for damages via specific funds348F 75
- e. Mediation349F 75
- 6.2. Limited data on effectiveness of mechanisms to access to justice 76
- 6.3. Identified barriers that women face when seeking justice 77
- 6.3.1. Difficulties for women (and practitioners) to recognise those practices as ‘violence’ 77
- 6.3.2. Structural barriers 77
- 6.3.3. Organisational obstacles 79
- 6.3.4. Barriers faced by specific groups of women 79
- 6.4. Role of CSOs in fostering better access to justice 80
- 7. ADDRESSING RESISTANCE AND IMPROVING AWARENESS OF HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONALS 83
- 7.1. A difficult recognition of the phenomenon among healthcare professionals across the EU 83
- 7.1.1. Reject of terminology ‘violence’ and underlying power structures 83
- 7.1.2. Pushing for an alternative frame 86
- 7.1.3. An emerging preoccupation among obstetric and gynaecological professionals 87
- 7.2. Initiatives to improve awareness and understanding among medical professionals 89
- 7.2.1. Awareness raising initiatives 89
- 7.2.2. Working groups 90
- 7.2.3. Training 91
- a. Limited integration of those issues in regular curriculum of healthcare professionals 91
- b. Training carried out in collaboration with CSOs 92
- c. Small-scale initiatives at local level 93
- d. Training for non-medical professionals 94
- 7.3. Emerging initiatives to improve obstetric and gynaecologic care 95
- 7.3.1. Improving practices towards evidence-based care 95
- 7.3.2. Promoting alternatives to over-medicalisation of obstetric and gynaecological care 97
- 7.3.3. Initiatives to address specific needs and inclusive care 99
- a. Migrant women 99
- b. Initiatives aiming at improving specific groups of women’s access to gynaecological care 100
- 8. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 101
- 8.1. Conclusions 101
- 8.2. Recommendations 102
- 8.2.1. Recommendations to improve understanding and recognition of obstetric and gynaecological violence 102
- 8.2.2. Recommendations to improve the legal framework applicable to obstetric and gynaecological violence and access to justice 107
- 8.2.3. Recommendations to improve prevention and obstetric and gynaecological violence 109
- Annex 1. Overview of data and information collected in the 27 EU Member States 112
- Annex 2. Country case studies 136
- Annex 3. List of EU and international interviews 183
- References 184