cover image: Local Administration and Racial Inequality in Federal Program Access: Insights from New Deal Work Relief

20.500.12592/2ksg3cw

Local Administration and Racial Inequality in Federal Program Access: Insights from New Deal Work Relief

11 Jul 2024

We examine racial discrimination in the New Deal by examining access to work relief. The Federal Government prohibited racial discrimination in work relief programs. However, eligibility was determined by local and state administrators. We estimate Black-white gaps in work relief access separately by county. The results show that about 40 percent of Blacks resided in counties with equal or better access than similar whites. Access for Black men was much worse in the South. We find that Black access was better in areas where Black and white workers were complementary and where more public and private resources were available.
political economy history public economics labor economics labor discrimination labor studies labor market structures development of the american economy labor and health history other history

Authors

Price V. Fishback, Jessamyn Schaller, Evan J. Taylor

Acknowledgements & Disclosure
We would like to thank Shawn Kantor, Marianne Wanamaker, Trevon Logan, John Parman, and Paul Rhode for sharing data. We benefited from the comments of participants in the 2022 Japan Socio-Economic History Society Meetings, the University of Arizona Economics 2020 Summer Workshop, the University of Victoria 2020 workshop, the IPUMS 2021 Data Intensive Research Projects, the NBER Summer Institute, the Yale Conference on Resilience in Economic History, the Virtual Economic History Seminar Sponsored by the EHA and the Cliometrics Society, LERA 2019 Session at the ASSA meetings, 2018 Social Science History Meetings, and the 2018 World Economic History Conference. We received valuable feedback from Dan Herbst, Maggie Jones, Shawn Kantor, Juan Pantano, and Tiemen Woutersen. The authors have no current relevant financial relationships or funding sources to disclose. The views expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Bureau of Economic Research.
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3386/w32681
Pages
55
Published in
United States of America

Table of Contents

Related Topics

All