cover image: Beliefs About the Economy are Excessively Sensitive to Household-Level Shocks: Evidence from Linked Survey and Administrative Data

20.500.12592/2sji419

Beliefs About the Economy are Excessively Sensitive to Household-Level Shocks: Evidence from Linked Survey and Administrative Data

11 Jul 2024

We study how people's beliefs about the economy covary with household-level events, utilizing a unique link between Danish administrative data and a large-scale survey of consumer expectations. We find that compared to actual inflation, people's inflation forecasts covary much more strongly (and negatively) with both recently realized household income changes and measures of expected future household income changes. We formally establish that these findings are stark deviations from the Bayesian limited-information rational expectations (LIRE) benchmark. Similar results hold for perceptions of past inflation ("backcasts"), suggesting that imperfect recall is a key mechanism for biased forecasts. Building on this, a series of additional tests, some of which utilize data on adverse health events, suggests that the forecast biases are at least partly due to selective recall cued by affective associations. That is, negative (positive) household-level events cue negative (positive) recollections, which lead to pessimistic (optimistic) forecasts.
taxation macroeconomics microeconomics public economics financial economics monetary economics behavioral economics economic fluctuations and growth

Authors

Dmitry Taubinsky, Luigi Butera, Matteo Saccarola, Chen Lian

Acknowledgements & Disclosure
For helpful comments and suggestions, we thank Hassan Afrouzi, George-Marios Angeletos, Nick Barberis, Andrew Caplin, Lawrence Christiano, Olivier Coibion, Francesca Bastianello, Stefano DellaVigna, Joel Flynn, Yuriy Gorodnichenko, Martin Eichenbaum, Joao Guerreiro, Joe Hazell, Kilian Huber, Cosmin Ilut, Alex Imas, Supreet Kaur, Spencer Kwon, Eben Lazarus, Yueran Ma, Pooya Molavi, Emi Nakamura, Ricardo Perez-Truglia, Pontus Rendahl, Frederic Robert-Nicoud, Christopher Roth, Karthik Sastry, Martin Schneider, Benjamin Schoefer, Na'ama Shenhav, Andrei Shleifer, Jason Somerville, Johannes Stroebel, Jon Steinsson, Aleksey Tetenov, Mike Woodford, and seminar participants at Columbia, Federal Reserve Bank of Boston, Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, Northwestern, Society for Economic Dynamics, Stanford, Stony Brook Workshop on Learning and Bounded Rationality, UC Berkeley, and UT Austin. We thank the Independent Research Fund Denmark (DFF) for financial support (Sapere Aude Starting Grant n.: 1053-00013B). Matteo Saccarola gracefully acknowledges support from the NBER fellowship in Behavioral Macroeconomics. We are grateful to Sophie Dewees, Chenxi Jiang, and Anders Yding for excellent research assistance. The views expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Bureau of Economic Research.
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3386/w32664
Pages
102
Published in
United States of America

Table of Contents

Related Topics

All