Authors
- Disclosure Date
- 2024/07/14
- Disclosure Status
- Disclosed
- Doc Name
- Stakeholder Engagement Plan (SEP) - Community Access and Urban Services Enhancement Project II - P181295
- Lending Instrument
- Investment Project Financing
- Pages
- 31
- Product Line
- IBRD/IDA
- Published in
- United States of America
- Rel Proj ID
- SB-Community Access And Urban Services Enhancement Project II -- P181295
- TF No/Name
- TF0C2300-Inclusive Adaptive Township Development (CAUSE II)
- Unit Owning
- Social EAP 1 (SEAS1)
- Version Type
- Final
Table of Contents
- STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT PLAN 1
- Solomon Islands Community Access and Urban Services Enhancement II 1
- P181295 1
- Version Final Draft 4 June 2024 1
- 2 31 2
- 1. Introduction 2
- 2. Project Description 2
- Component 1 Resilient Township Infrastructure 2
- Component 2 Safe and Inclusive Communities 2
- Component 3 Enhanced Urban Productivity 2
- Component 4 Land Administration Urban Management and Maintenance 2
- Component 5 Project Management 2
- 3. Objectives of the SEP 2
- 3 31 3
- 4. Stakeholder identification and analysis 3
- Project Partners 3
- Affected Parties 3
- Other Interested Parties 3
- Vulnerable Groups 3
- Table 1 Stakeholders and their Interest in the Project 3
- 4 31 4
- 5 31 5
- 6 31 6
- 5. Stakeholder Engagement Program 6
- 5.1. Summary of stakeholder engagement done during project preparation 6
- 7 31 7
- Table 2 - List of StakeholdersCommunities that have been and to be consulted during Project 7
- 8 31 8
- 9 31 9
- 10 31 10
- 5.2. Stakeholder engagement strategy 10
- 5.3. Stakeholder engagement plan 10
- 11 31 11
- Table 3 Indicative Stakeholder Engagement Plan 11
- 12 31 12
- Table 4 Indicative Disclosure Plan 12
- 13 31 13
- 5.4. Key Messaging 13
- 6. Feedback and Grievance Redress System 13
- 6.1 Grievance Mechanism 13
- 14 31 14
- 6.2 World Bank Grievance Redress System 14
- 7. Monitoring and Reporting 14
- Table 5 Example SEP-related indicators for semi-annual Progress Reports 14
- 15 31 15
- 8. Resources and Responsibilities for Implementation 15
- 8.1. Responsibilities for Implementation 15
- Table 6 Responsibilities for Implementation 15
- Party Responsibility 15
- 16 31 16
- 8.2 Implementation Budget 16
- 17 31 17
- ANNEXES 17
- 18 31 18
- ANNEX I. Abbreviations and Acronyms 18
- 19 31 19
- ANNEX II. Stakeholders Included in Pre-Appraisal Consultations 19
- 20 31 20
- 21 31 21
- Annex III. Grievance Redress System 21
- Updates to the GRS 21
- 1. 2. 21
- 22 31 22
- Feedback and Grievance Redress System 22
- The GRS comprises 22
- Definition of Feedback 22
- Definition and Types of Grievances 22
- Feedback Mechanism 22
- 23 31 23
- CAUSE Project Feedback Form 23
- 24 31 24
- Grievance Mechanism 24
- 25 31 25
- Step 1 of the Process Resolution by Field Staff 25
- Step 2 of the Process Resolution by Local Leaders 25
- Step 3 of the Process Involvement of Project Managers 25
- Step 4 of the Process Referral to Implementing Agencies 25
- 26 31 26
- Step 5 of the Process Involvement of Bank Staff A Last Resort 26
- Complaints Handling and Grievance Redress Process Communication and Reporting Summary 26
- 27 31 27
- Staff Sanctions or Actions 27
- 28 31 28
- Complainant category 28
- Name of Complainant . Community worker 28
- Date of Complaint Group leader 28
- Contact Phone Contractor 28
- Location of Ward .. General public 28
- Contact Address NGO 28
- Councilor 28
- Parliamentarian 28
- Other please specify 28
- Ethnic Background ...... 28
- Gender .. Age 28
- 29 31 29
- Name of Project Staff Date of Action 29
- Details of Level 1 responseresolution including persons involved 29
- Result Resolved Unresolved and Referred to Level 2 29
- Commentsreaction from complainant Date ........................................ 29
- Name of Project Staff Date of Action 29
- Details of Level 2 responseresolution including persons involved 29
- Result Resolved Unresolved and Referred to Level 3 29
- Commentsreaction from complainant Date .................................... 29
- Name of Project Staff Date of Action 29
- Result Resolved Unresolved and Referred to a Higher Authority 29
- Details of Level 3 responseresolution including persons involved 29
- Referred to City Clerk MID PS PSC WB Date feedback was provided to complainant . 29
- Commentsreaction from complainant 29
- Final Status .................................................... Signed ................................................. 29
- Register of Feedback and Complaints 30
- 31 31 31
- Classification of FeedbackComplaints for MIS System 31
- Complaint Summary Form 31
- For direct entry into project MIS 31
- 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 31