cover image: The Social Value of Temporary Carbon Removals and Delayed Emissions

20.500.12592/10fmy7c

The Social Value of Temporary Carbon Removals and Delayed Emissions

18 Jul 2024

An economic approach to calculating the Social Value of Temporary Reductions (SVTR) in atmospheric carbon is discussed. The SVTR allows different carbon removals projects to be prioritised in a way that maximises welfare and establishes equivalence between temporary, risky removals with permanent ones in terms of avoided welfare losses from climate damages. The approach is compared to previous attempts in the physical and natural sciences and economics to price temporary emissions reductions, none of which successfully integrate economics and climate science. Applications of the SVTR exist in public project appraisal, Life Cycle Analysis, pricing carbon debts and determining short term carbon credit and offset contracts. Potential criticisms of equivalence measures and tonne-year accounting stemming from concerns that temporary removals do not impact long-term temperatures are shown to be special cases of our integrated economic approach. Temporary removals provide transitory cooling benefits and if repeated are equivalent to permanent solutions. They also can have permanent effects via learning by doing or reducing the likelihood of tipping points. The SVTR helps determine how temporary removals can fit into an efficient response to climate. Ruling out temporary removals and equivalence, and the intertemporal transfers that they imply, could unnecessarily tie the hands of policy makers.
environment environment and energy economics environmental and resource economics

Authors

Ben Groom, Frank Venmans

Acknowledgements & Disclosure
BG thanks Dragon Capital for generously funding the Dragon Capital Chair in Biodiversity Economics. Both BG and FV acknowledge financial support from the Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment, at the London School of Economics and the ESRC Centre for Climate Change Economics and Policy (CCCEP) via ESRC grant ref: ES/R009708/1. BG and FV acknowledge generous funding from the UKRI/NERC BIOADD project (ref: NE/X002292/1). The views expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Bureau of Economic Research.
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3386/w32734
Pages
30
Published in
United States of America

Table of Contents

Related Topics

All