This project described methods of early identification and implementation of various interventions used to increase achievement of students at risk in grades three, four, and five at John D. Floyd Elementary School in Spring Hill, Florida. The 51 children who qualified for and were enrolled in the dropout prevention program had achievement scores below national and state norms. Possible causes of the low achievement scores included poor attendance, retention, inconsistent time on task, inappropriate teaching strategies, large class size, inadequate material, nonsequenced curriculum, and unstructured computer instructional time. Individual education plans were designed for children and interventions included curriculum revision, specific teaching strategies related to individual needs, increased use of technology and manipulatives to reinforce instruction, positive reinforcement of lessons, consistent disciplinary practices with rewards, and guidance activities to develop self-image. After implementation of the program the achievement scores of the targeted students increased. Eleven appendixes provide copies of: (1) suggested criteria for identification of students; (2) additional criteria; (3) an alternative program statement of eligibility; (4) an opportunity matrix; (5) a parent current status survey; (6) a teacher survey; (7) a parent evaluation survey; (8) a dropout prevention program checklist; (9) a student behavior contract; (10) a program statement of eligibility; and (11) student assessment results. Contains 31 references. (MDM)
Authors
- Peer Reviewed
- F
- Publication Type
- ['Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations', 'Tests/Questionnaires']
- Published in
- United States of America
Table of Contents
- Possible Causes of Problem ... 5
- As a whole students at John D. Floyd Elementary School 23
- The guidance counselor solicited candidates for the dropout 24
- Work is best accomplished in an environment that has few 48
- The students were instructed in the use of the various 53
- The supervisor was most interested in the 55
- Preliminary evaluation of the program was performed by the 65
- 2. How much more involved would you like 66
- 3. What suggestions for parent follow-up would you give 66
- In January 1992 each teacher was evaluated as per contract 66
- Retention One retention or 94
- 7. Tardles Ten or more tardies during 94
- 9. atunsityiLEgusitisau Assigned to Alternative 94
- I. Students who have 95
- 4. Students who 95
- 5. Students displaying 95
- 6. Students who have been 95