The study explored the qualifications of learning-disabled college students by examining the academic performance (first year grade point average--GPA) of 179 learning-disabled and 249 nonlearning-disabled students classified by two objective admission criteria--either Scholastic Aptitude Test (SAT) or high-school class rank. Overall, the scores of the learning-disabled group were approximately .5 standard deviations lower than those of nondisabled students for high-school percentile rank, SAT verbal, SAT math, and first year GPA. Stepwise multiple regression analyses showed that high-school academic achievement was the best predictor of college GPA, with SAT verbal scores also contributing to the prediction. SAT math scores and learning-disabled versus nonlearning-disabled categorization did not add to the prediction of college academic performance. An additional comparison of high and low academically achieving learning-disabled and nondisabled students found that percentile rank in high school class correctly classified 92% of low academically achieving learning-disabled students but only 28% of the high-achieving students. Includes 8 tables/figures and 13 references. (DB)
Authors
- Assessments and Surveys
- SAT (College Admission Test)
- Peer Reviewed
- F
- Publication Type
- ['Speeches/Meeting Papers', 'Reports - Research']
- Published in
- United States of America
Table of Contents
- Felicia L. Wilczenski 2
- Notre Dame College 2
- Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Eastern 2
- Heikkila 1988 Scott 1990 have pointed to a need for 3
- How useful are objective admission criteria in 4
- Because ef missing admission data for the two. 5
- Insert Table 1 about here 5
- GPA were supplied by the university records office. 5
- Spring semesters of 1989 and 1990. 5
- Comparative Analyses 5
- SAT scores and high school rank 6
- Table 3 shows no statistically 6
- Predictive Analyses 6
- Relationships between academic performance in college 6
- Insert Table 4 about here 7
- From a classification 8
- One way 8
- Figure 2 shows the 8
- Among the nonlearning disabled 9
- Academic performance indicators SAT scores high 9
- SAT scores specifically verbal test scores 10
- References 13
- Special Education 19 255-267 13
- Clark F.L 1982 Learning disabilities in adolescent 13
- Focus on Exceptional Children 11 1-12. 13
- Exceptionta Children 57 264-270. 13
- HEATH 1988 11 update Washington DC National 13
- Committee on Employmait of the Handicapped 13
- Lerner J. 1989. Learning disabiliiiest Theories 14
- Journal of Srecial Education 16 73-85. 14
- Learning Disabilities 15
- Demographics nonLD 15
- All Undergraduates 15
- A11 15
- Education Engineering FoodNatural Resources 15
- Health Science 15
- 67.8 Unknown 15
- Family Income self-report 15
- Planning 15
- Table 2 16
- Group 16
- Correlations 16
- 1st Yr GPA 16
- SAT Verbal 16
- SAT Math 16
- 1st Yr GPA 16
- -2.00000 18
- -4.00000 18
- High School 18
- 2.00000 18
- SAT Math 18
- First Year 18
- -2.00000 18
- -4.00000 18
- Anevsis of Covariance First Year GPA of LD and NonLD Students 19
- Regression 19
- Between 19
- LD and NonLD University Students Academic Performance 20
- Table 4 20
- Buinmarv of Stepwise Multiple Regxession Analyses for GPA Learning Disabled and 20
- Increment 20
- SAT Math 20
- LD vs. nonLD 20
- Predicted 22
- Overall 22
- Percent Correct 22
- 91.89 22
- Predicted GPA 24
- Observed GPA 24
- High 24
- 38.24 24
- 62.25 24
- Observed GPA 26
- High 26