Findings are reported from a statewide survey of middle and junior high schools in Wisconsin. The study had two major purposes: (1) to determine the extent to which the clinical supervision cycle was a component of staff development programs; and (2) to identify characteristics of existing clinical supervision practices within staff development programs. As defined for this study, the clinical supervision cycle has three components: preconference, observation, and postconference. Of the 136 principals who responded to the survey, 84 percent indicated that they had formal staff development programs at their schools and that 39 percent of these programs included the clinical supervision cycle. Although the original concept of clinical supervision, as outlined in the literature, does not view clinical supervision as evaluation, a significant number of respondents indicated that, at their schools, clinical supervision was used for assessment and evaluation. The data also indicated that, at many schools, the clinical supervision cycle was used to assist teacher growth and development. (Contains 18 references.) (IAH)
Authors
- Location
- Wisconsin
- Peer Reviewed
- F
- Publication Type
- ['Speeches/Meeting Papers', 'Reports - Research']
- Published in
- United States of America
Table of Contents
- In response cycle as a supervision 3
- While junior high schools. 3
- Staff Development 3
- 1990 which 3
- Findings report that 3
- 1990 p. 312. 3
- Beliefs include 4
- Methods 5
- FindinRs 6
- No schools were K-12. 6
- The mean 6
- Five schools learningproject 1. 7
- More recent 7
- Frequency Frequency 7
- 14 schools. 8
- Three Stochowski. 8
- And two 9
- Report is 9
- Administration writes 10
- Discussion 11
- Eighty four included the clinical supervision cycle. 11
- Duke links 11
- 1990 p. 63-4. 12
- References 13
- New York 13
- Barth R.S. 1990. Improving schools from within. 13
- Francisco 13
- Jossey-Bass. 13
- Blumberg A. 1990. 13
- Journal 13
- Is there 13
- Association Boston. 13
- ED 319 724 13
- Cogan M.L. 1973. Clinical supervision. Houghton 13
- Mifflin. 13
- Education 1111 68-76. 13
- Dillon-Peterson B. 1981. 13
- Perspective 1981 pp. 1-10. In B. Dillon- Alexandria VA 13
- Development. 13
- Duke D.L 1990. 13
- Fessler R. 1990. 13
- Programming for staff development 13
- Fanning the flame. 13
- New York 13
- Glickman C.D. 1990. Supervision of instruction 13
- Allyn and Bacon. 13
- Clinical supervision teachers 2nd ed.. 13
- Hirsh S. Ponder G. 1991. 13
- Lambert L. 1989. 13
- Synthesis of 14
- 453 77-78. 14
- Smyth J. 1986. Clinical supervision 14
- Technocratic 14
- Thorlacius J.M. 1984. 14