This study examines various options available in the formulation of a proposal to increase student charges in the University of California and the State colleges. Four issues are discussed: (1) cost distribution of state and student support; (2) uses of the fees for instruction, student services, student financial aid, research, community services, capital outlay current operations, debt instrument, and pay-as-you-go plan; (3) techniques for cost administration, i.e., comprehensive loan, graduated charges, flat charges, differentiated charges, voucher system; and (4) effects of fee increases on student population redistribution and attrition. It is estimated that 13,800 students would be affected. Fifty-five pages of appended resolutions, statements, graphs and charts comprise the basis for the study. There are 6 policy proposals regarding the collection and administration of funds. (NF)
- Authorizing Institution
- California State Coordinating Council for Higher Education, Sacramento.
- Location
- California
- Peer Reviewed
- F
- Published in
- United States of America
Table of Contents
- 269 63
- WHEREAS 63
- WHEREAS 63
- RESOLVED 63
- RESOLVED 63
- COORDINATING COUNCIL 63
- EDUCATION 63
- Resolution on Student Fees 63
- University and State College practices with 63
- Certain definitions in the Master Plan regarding 63
- That the Coordinating Council for Higher Education the University and State Colleges to adopted the follow- 63
- Student fees are defined as charges to students to cover the cost of non-instructional services and programs that are designed to maintain 63
- That the State Colleges and University report Council at its July meeting regarding their 63
- October 8 1968 63
- Dk. Owen A. Knorr Director Coordinating Council for Higher Education 1020 - 12th Street 70
- November 5 1968 70
- With regard to the question posed in your student financial assistance and dining facilities has not 70
- This is the basis on which our 1969-70 discussion of student financial assistance facilities was limited by the press of time I would also like to comment on those two 70
- Thus progress toward removing the real 70
- Dining faciiities - We have not 70
- State practice in dining because this appears to 70
- Dr. Owen A. Knorr 71
- November 5 1968 71
- Should you wish further clarification please let 71
- Glenn S. Dumke Chancellor 71
- GSDja 71
- Director Coordinating Council for Higher Education California 72
- January 8 1969 72
- As a party to the development of the 72
- October 72
- We have not yet given further 72
- Council for which 72
- Y do not 72
- We shall keep yoU 72
- Glenn S. Dumke Chancellor 72
- GSDls 72
- Spalding 72
- Mr. Thomas H. 72
- McGrath 72
- EXPENDITURES 100
