During the summer of 1975 the program "Learning to Read Through the Arts" had as its target population 130 Elementary Secondary Education Act Title I eligible children ages 10 to 12 who were performing at least two years below grade level in reading. The students were divided into homogeneous reading groups based on standardized achievement test scores. The same groups also received instruction, on a limited basis, in mathematics. The program focused on the improvement of reading skills through motivating pupil interests. Supplementary workshops in the arts (dance, theater, music, painting, sculpture, mixed media, drawing, printmaking, puppetry, crafts, film making etc.), were closely correlated with the reading program. Weekly field trips supplemented the instructional program. Parents attended an orientation session and were provided opportunities to participate in workshops taught by an arts and crafts instructor and/or the social worker. Parents also participated on the advisory council of the program. The various components of the program were competently coordinated, supervised and administered. The pupils who completed the program exceeded anticipated outcomes. Positive growth gains were recorded on the McGraw-Hill Precriptive Reading and the Prescriptive Mathematics inventories. (Author/JM)
Authors
- Authorizing Institution
- New York City Board of Education, Brooklyn, NY. Office of Educational Evaluation.
- Laws Policies and Programs
- Elementary and Secondary Education Act Title I
- Location
- New York (New York)
- Peer Reviewed
- F
- Publication Type
- Reports - Descriptive
- Published in
- United States of America
Table of Contents
- UD 016 843 1
- AUTHOR Seiierth John C. INSTITUTION PUB DATE 09-61635 1
- IDENTIFIERS Title I New York New York 1
- ABSTRACT 1
- Appendix B - Data Loss Form....... 3
- Table 4
- 3CM 4
- 4DM 4
- READING 4
- 9DR 4
- Inventories 5
- Children from 52 Title I schools in 24 districtri were 6
- Parents 6
- CHAPTER II 7
- Limted ancillary objectives .in mathe- 7
- Inventory. 7
- Evaluatl.on ObjectiyeHNo. 1 was to determine if as a result of 7
- The P.R.I. 8
- CHAPTER III 9
- -4777- 10
- 3 objectives 2.4 2 objectives 1 objectives 10
- Objectives 10
- - Measured Objects 10
- 112 11
- Table 5E24 confirms the percentage 11
- 90-100 13
- 80-89 70-79 10-19 13
- 2.27 13
- 1.50 7.57 22.72 13
- 132 13
- Mastery 13
- 23103 25101 27112 13
- Words Statemen s 13
- 17125 13
- 3131 13
- Inference 13
- Theme 13
- 23120 13
- 14 14 13
- Mood 15122 14121 20122 10119 1983 14
- 17116 12 3961 2241 4591 3772 14
- Silent letters. 14
- 6-10 14
- 16-20 31-35 14
- 113 14
- Objectives. 15
- 60-69 23.01 15
- 4 11 1- 9 0 113 15
- -with Table 2BR indicates that the 15
- 11FR. 15
- Levels 16
- 197346 16
- An under achieving population sample can be expected toadd to eh 16
- Evaluation Objectives..called for the 18
- This was done. 18
- This program has had an impact on the. New York City 18
- Improving Visual Perception -Stalls in Art Classes in High Schools 18
- S4mmaryof Vialor Ftnqinga 19
- -Hecommendations 20
- The.fact that attendance 20
- New York. 20
- How- 20
- This 21
- If the 22
- -as alwasure 22
- Noof 26