Materialism as a doctrine is, of course, a part of the history of philosophy, even if it was often a polemical construct, and it took until the 18th century for philosophers to be willing to call themselves materialists. Difficulties also have been pointed out in terms of “continuity,” i.e., does what Democritus, Lucretius, Hobbes and Diderot have to say about matter, the body and the soul all belong in one discursive and conceptual frame? Interestingly, materialism is also a classic figure in the history of medicine, often intersecting with philosophical considerations. Notably, the question of body-soul relations. This is apparent in Galen’s treatise on body and soul and then much more massively in the early modern period (with reference to Galen, but also Lucretius, and Aristotelian naturalism). In the following essay I reflect on the exact nature of early modern medical materialism, its philosophical status and contribution.
Authors
Related Organizations
- Bibliographic Reference
- Charles T. Wolfe. Atheist Therapy: Radical Embodiment in Early Modern Medical Materialism. Diametros : an Online Journal of Philosophy, 2023, pp.1-16. ⟨10.33392/diam.1881⟩. ⟨halshs-04334040⟩
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.33392/diam.1881
- HAL Collection
- ["Sciences de l'Homme et de la Société", 'Université Toulouse 2', 'Equipe de Recherche sur les Rationalités Philosophiques et les Savoirs', 'Archive ouverte en Histoire etPhilosophie des Sciences et des Techniques', 'Collection LaCAS - Open Archives in Language and Cultural Area Studies']
- HAL Identifier
- 4334040
- Institution
- ['Université de Toulouse II Jean Jaurès', 'Université Toulouse - Jean Jaurès']
- Laboratory
- Equipe de Recherche sur les Rationalités Philosophiques et les Savoirs
- Published in
- France