Corporate Climate Responsibility Monitor 2024 - ASSESSING THE TRANSPARENCY AND INTEGRITY OF

NewClimate Institute

Due to the fragmentation, inconsistency and ambiguity of some of the information provided by the assessed companies, as well as the fact that the authors did not seek to validate the public self-reported information provided by those companies, the authors cannot guarantee the factual accuracy of all information presented in this report. [...] (Section 1.2) In contradiction to the key recommendations of the Integrity Flexibility to offset scope 3 emissions is not the right solution Part of the rationale for scope 3 flexibility proposals is to Matters report by HLEG, which calls for no offsetting towards to address the challenges that companies understandably increase the flow of voluntary climate finance to climate the achievement of in. [...] None of the Increase the frequency of the validation cycle for 2030 participation of companies and needs to accommodate the five companies commit to reducing overproduction or moving corporate climate targets to align validations with the perspectives of different stakeholders when developing its away from the fast fashion business model. [...] Regardless of the type of target and the terminology used, the commitments should send a clear signal to the extent to which a company publicly discloses the for immediate action to decarbonise the value chain and avoid misleading consumers, shareholders, observers and regulators. [...] The colour of the data points represents our assessment of the integrity of company's 2030 targets, based on their sufficiency compared to sector-specific 1.5 °C aligned benchmarks, and the appropriateness of the terminology used in the pledge communication.