Chemicals and Waste Issues of Concern: A Summary Analysis of Stakeholders’ Views

Files

Table of Contents

• Figure A1. Stakeholders’ views on the approaches or measures to address arsenic at the international level 13
• Figure A2. Stakeholders’ views on the factors preventing action or progress on addressing arsenic in their country or organization 13
• Figure A3. Stakeholders’ views on the sectors or value chains which need to be closely involved in developing solutions for arsenic 15
• Figure A4. Forums and instruments that could lead international action on arsenic 16
• Figure A5. Stakeholders’ views on international agendas with important linkages to arsenic 17
• Figure A6. Stakeholders’ views on the approaches or measures to address cadmium at the international level 19
• Figure A7. Stakeholders’ views on the factors preventing action or progress on addressing cadmium in their country or organization 20
• Figure A8. Stakeholders’ views on the sectors or value chains which need to be closely involved in developing solutions for cadmium 20
• Figure A9. Forums and instruments that could lead international action on cadmium 21
• Figure A10. Stakeholders’ views on the international agendas which have important linkages with cadmium 22
• Figure A11. Stakeholders’ views on the approaches or measures to address lead at the international level 25
• Figure A12. Stakeholders’ views on the factors preventing action or progress on addressing lead in their country or organization 26
• Figure A13. Stakeholders’ views on the sectors or value chains which need to be closely involved in developing solutions for lead 27
• Figure A14. Forums and instruments that could lead international action on lead 28
• Figure A15. Stakeholders’ views on the international agendas which have important linkages with lead 29
• Figure A16. Stakeholders’ views on the approaches or measures to address lead in paint at the international level 32
• Figure A17. Stakeholders’ views on the factors preventing action or progress on addressing lead in paint in their country or organization 33
• Figure A18. Stakeholders’ views on the sectors or value chains which need to be closely involved in developing solutions for lead in paint 34
• Figure A19. Forums and instruments that could lead international action on lead in paint 35
• Figure A20. Stakeholders’ views on the international agendas which have important linkages with lead in paint 35
• Figure A21. Stakeholders’ views on the approaches or measures to address organotins at the international level 37
• Figure A22. Stakeholders’ views on the factors preventing action or progress on addressing organotins in their country or organization 38
• Figure A23. Stakeholders’ views on the sectors or value chains which need to be closely involved in developing solutions for organotins 38
• Figure A24. Forums and instruments that could lead international action on organotins 40
• Figure A25. Stakeholders’ views on the international agendas which have important linkages with organotins 41
• Figure A26. Stakeholders’ views on the approaches or measures to address HHPs at the international level 44
• Figure A27. Stakeholders’ views on the factors preventing action or progress on addressing HHPs in their country or organization 45
• Figure A28. Stakeholders’ views on the sectors or value chains which need to be closely involved in developing solutions for HHPs 47
• Figure A29. Forums and instruments that could lead international action on HHPs 48
• Figure A30. Stakeholders’ views on the international agendas which have important linkages with HHPs 49
• Figure A31. Stakeholders’ views on the approaches or measures to address glyphosate at the international level 52
• Figure A32. Stakeholders’ views on the factors preventing action or progress on addressing glyphosate in their country or organization 53
• Figure A33. Stakeholders views on the sectors or value chains which need to be closely involved in developing solutions for glyphosate 54
• Figure A34. Forums and instruments that could lead international action on glyphosate 55
• Figure A35. Stakeholders’ views on the international agendas which have important linkages with glyphosate 56
• Figure A36. Stakeholders’ views on the approaches or measures to address neonicotinoids at the international level 59
• Figure A37. Stakeholders’ views on the factors preventing action or progress on addressing neonicotinoids in their country or organization 60
• Figure A38. Stakeholders’ views on the sectors or value chains which need to be closely involved in developing solutions for neonicotinoids 61
• Figure A39. Forums and instruments that could lead international action on neonicotinoids 62
• Figure A40. Stakeholders’ views on the international agendas which have important linkages with neonicotinoids 63
• Figure A41. Stakeholders’ views on the approaches or measures to address EPPPs at the international level 67
• Figure A42. Stakeholders’ views on the factors preventing action or progress on addressing EPPPs in their country or organization 68
• Figure A43. Stakeholders views on the sectors or value chains which need to be closely involved in developing solutions for EPPPs 69
• Figure A44. Forums and instruments that could lead international action on EPPPs 70
• Figure A45. Stakeholders’ views on the international agendas which have important linkages with EPPPs 71
• Figure A46. Stakeholders’ views on the approaches or measures to address chemicals in products at the international level 75
• Figure A47. Stakeholders’ views on the factors preventing action or progress on addressing chemicals in products in their country or organization 76
• Figure A48. Stakeholders’ views on the sectors and value chains which need to be closely involved in developing solutions for chemicals in products 77
• Figure A49. Forums and instruments that could lead international action on CiP 78
• Figure A50. Stakeholders’ views on the international agendas which have important linkages with chemicals in products 79
• Figure A51. Stakeholders’ views on the approaches or measures to address BPA at the international level 81
• Figure A52. Stakeholders’ views on the factors preventing action or progress on addressing BPA in their country or organization 82
• Figure A53. Stakeholders’ views on the sectors or value chains which need to be closely involved in developing solutions for BPA 83
• Figure A54. Forums and instruments that could lead international action on BPA 84
• Figure A55. Stakeholders’ views on the international agendas which have important linkages with BPA 85
• Figure A56. Stakeholders’ views on the approaches or measures to address EDCs at the international level 87
• Figure A57. Stakeholders’ views on the factors preventing action or progress on addressing EDCs in their country or organization 87
• Figure A58. Stakeholders’ views on the sectors and value chains which need to be closely involved in developing solutions for EDCs 88
• Figure A59. Forums and instruments that could lead international action on EDCs 89
• Figure A60. Stakeholders’ views on the international agendas which have important linkages with EDCs 90
• Figure A61. Stakeholders’ views on the approaches or measures to address HSLEEP at the international level 93
• Figure A62. Stakeholders’ views on the factors preventing action or progress on addressing HSLEEP in their country or organization 94
• Figure A63. Stakeholders’ views on the sectors or value chains which need to be closely involved in developing solutions for HSLEEP 95
• Figure A64. Forums and instruments that could lead international action on HSLEEP 96
• Figure A65. Stakeholders’ views on the international agendas which have important linkages with HSLEEP 97
• Figure A66. Stakeholders’ views on the approaches or measures to address microplastics at the international level 98
• Figure A67. Stakeholders’ views on the factors preventing action or progress on addressing microplastics in their country or organization 100
• Figure A68. Stakeholders’ views on the sectors or value chains which need to be closely involved in developing solutions for microplastics 101
• Figure A69. Forums and instruments that could lead international action on microplastics 102
• Figure A70. Stakeholders’ views on the international agendas which have important linkages with microplastics 103
• Figure A71. Stakeholders’ views on the approaches or measures appropriate to deal with nanotechnology and manufactured nanomaterials at the international level 105
• Figure A72. Stakeholders’ views on the factors preventing action or progress on addressing nanotechnology and manufactured nanomaterials in their country or organization 107
• Figure A73. Stakeholders’ views on the sectors or value chains which need to be closely involved in developing solutions for nanotechnology and manufactured nanomaterials 108
• Figure A74. Forums and instruments that could lead international action on nanotechnology and manufactured nanomaterials 109
• Figure A75. Stakeholders’ views on the international agendas which have important linkages with nanotechnology and manufactured nanomaterials 110
• Figure A76. Stakeholders’ views on the approaches or measures appropriate to addressing PFAS at the international level 112
• Figure A77. Stakeholders’ views on the factors preventing action or progress on addressing PFAS in their country or organization 113
• Figure A78. Stakeholders’ views on the sectors or value chains which need to be closely involved in developing solutions for PFAS 114
• Figure A79. Forums and instruments that could lead international action on PFAS 116
• Figure A80. Stakeholders’ views on the international agendas which have important linkages to PFAS 117
• Figure A81. Stakeholders’ views on the approaches or measures to address phthalates at the international level 119
• Figure A82. Stakeholders’ views on the factors preventing action or progress on addressing phthalates in their country or organization 120
• Figure A83. Stakeholders’ views on the sectors or value chains which need to be closely involved in developing solutions for phthalates 121
• Figure A84. Forums and instruments that could lead international action on phthalates 122
• Figure A85. Stakeholders’ views on the international agendas which have important linkages with phthalates 122
• Figure A86. Stakeholders’ views on the approaches or measures to address PAHs at the international level 125
• Figure A87. Stakeholders’ views on the factors preventing action or progress on addressing PAHs in their country or organization 126
• Figure A88. Stakeholders’ views on sectors or value chains relevant to PAHs 127
• Figure A89. Forums and instruments that could lead international action on PAHs 128
• Figure A90. Stakeholders’ views on the international agendas which have important linkages with PAHs 128
• Figure A91. Stakeholders’ views on the approaches or measures to address triclosan at the international level 131
• Figure A92. Stakeholders’ views on the factors preventing action or progress on addressing triclosan in their country or organization 132
• Figure A93. Stakeholders’ views on the sectors or value chains which need to be closely involved in developing solutions for triclosan 133
• Figure A94. Forums and instruments that could lead international action on triclosan 134
• Figure A95. Stakeholders’ views on the international agendas which have important linkages with triclosan 134