Authors
Related Organizations
- Disclosure Date
- 2024/10/06
- Disclosure Status
- Disclosed
- Doc Name
- Pakistan - PFM accountability to supp. service deli
- Lending Instrument
- Program-for-Results
- Pages
- 30
- Product Line
- IBRD/IDA
- Published in
- United States of America
- Rel Proj ID
- PK-Pfm And Accountability To Support Service Delivery Pforr -- P157507
- TF No/Name
- TF0B1417-Strengthening accoutability for immunization spending,TF0A4894-Pakistan PFM and accountability to support service delivery Program-for,TF0B3883-Life Cycle Cost Analysis for e-GP in Pakistan
- Unit Owning
- EFI-SAR-GOV-FM & PS-1 (ESAG1)
- Version Type
- Final
Table of Contents
- Independent Evaluation Group IEG 1
- 1. Project Data 1
- Project ID Program Name 1
- Country Practice AreaLead 1
- LCTF Numbers Closing Date Original Total Program Cost USD 1
- Bank Approval Date Closing Date Actual 1
- IBRDIDA USD Grants USD 1
- Prepared by Reviewed by ICR Review Coordinator Group 1
- 2. Program Context and Development Objectives 1
- DEVOBJTBL a. Objectives 1
- Independent Evaluation Group IEG 2
- DLI 1 Allocated amount US70 million 2
- DLI 2 Allocated amount US70 million 2
- DLI 3 Allocated amount US50 million 2
- DLI 4 Allocated amount US30 million 2
- DLI 5 2
- Independent Evaluation Group IEG 3
- Allocated amount US30 million 3
- DLI 6 Allocated amount US40 million 3
- DLI 7 Allocated amount US30 million 3
- DLI 8 Allocated amount US80 million 3
- Independent Evaluation Group IEG 4
- Independent Evaluation Group IEG 5
- 3. Relevance 5
- Relevance of Objectives 5
- Rationale 5
- Independent Evaluation Group IEG 6
- PFM Reform Strategy 2018-2027 6
- Pakistans Vision 2025 6
- Country Partnership Strategy CPS FY15-20 6
- International Development Association IDA 18 commitment Sustainable Development Goal SDG 16 6
- World Development Report 2017 Governance and the Law Systematic Country Diagnostic SCD 6
- Public Expenditure and Financial Accountability PEFA Assessment of 2012 Project to Improve Financial Reporting and Auditing PIFRA 6
- Independent Evaluation Group IEG 7
- Rating 7
- Independent Evaluation Group IEG 8
- DLI 1 8
- DLI 8
- Rationale 8
- Rating 8
- DLI 2 8
- DLI 8
- Rationale 8
- Independent Evaluation Group IEG 9
- Rating 9
- DLI 3 9
- DLI 9
- Rationale 9
- Independent Evaluation Group IEG 10
- Rating 10
- DLI 4 10
- DLI 10
- Rationale 10
- Rating 10
- Independent Evaluation Group IEG 11
- DLI 5 11
- DLI 11
- Rationale 11
- Rating 11
- DLI 6 11
- DLI 11
- Rationale 11
- Independent Evaluation Group IEG 12
- Rating 12
- DLI 7 12
- DLI 12
- Rationale 12
- Rating 12
- Independent Evaluation Group IEG 13
- DLI 8 13
- DLI 13
- Rationale 13
- Rating 13
- Independent Evaluation Group IEG 14
- OVERALL RELEVANCE RATING 14
- Rationale 14
- Rating 14
- 4. Achievement of Objectives Efficacy 14
- OBJECTIVE 1 14
- Objective 14
- Rationale 14
- Independent Evaluation Group IEG 15
- Independent Evaluation Group IEG 16
- Independent Evaluation Group IEG 17
- Independent Evaluation Group IEG 18
- Independent Evaluation Group IEG 19
- Independent Evaluation Group IEG 20
- Rating 20
- OBJECTIVE 2 20
- Objective 20
- Rationale 20
- Independent Evaluation Group IEG 21
- Independent Evaluation Group IEG 22
- Rating 22
- OVERALL EFFICACY 22
- Rationale 22
- Rating 22
- Independent Evaluation Group IEG 23
- 5. Outcome 23
- Outcome Rating 23
- 6. Risk to Development Outcome 23
- 7. Assessment of Bank Performance 23
- Independent Evaluation Group IEG 24
- Independent Evaluation Group IEG 25
- Quality-at-Entry Rating 25
- Quality of Supervision Rating 25
- Overall Bank Performance Rating 25
- 8. ME Design Implementation Utilization 25
- Independent Evaluation Group IEG 26
- ME Quality Rating 26
- Independent Evaluation Group IEG 27
- 9. Other Issues 27
- 10. Ratings 27
- Independent Evaluation Group IEG 28
- Ratings ICR IEG Reason for DisagreementsComment 28
- 11. Lessons 28
- Independent Evaluation Group IEG 29
- 12. Assessment Recommended 29
- 13. Comments on Quality of ICR 29
- Independent Evaluation Group IEG 30
