Authors
- Disclosure Date
- 2024/10/16
- Disclosure Status
- Disclosed
- Doc Name
- Cameroon - CM Social Safety Nets
- Lending Instrument
- Investment Project Financing
- Pages
- 17
- Product Line
- IBRD/IDA
- Published in
- United States of America
- Rel Proj ID
- CM-Cameroon Social Safety Nets -- P128534
- TF No/Name
- TF0A8422-Cameroon_Forced Displacement Evidence Building,TF0B4950-CAMEROON: PILOTING TEMPORAL CRECHES TO MAXIMIZE WOMENâS PARTICIPAT
- Unit Owning
- Social Protection & Labor AFR 3 (HAWS3)
- Version Type
- Final
Table of Contents
- Independent Evaluation Group IEG 1
- 1. Project Data 1
- Project ID Project Name 1
- Country Practice AreaLead 1
- LCTF Numbers Closing Date Original Total Project Cost USD 1
- Bank Approval Date Closing Date Actual 1
- IBRDIDA USD Grants USD 1
- Prepared by Reviewed by ICR Review Coordinator Group 1
- 2. Project Objectives and Components 1
- DEVOBJTBL a. Objectives 1
- Independent Evaluation Group IEG 2
- Did the Board approve the revised objectiveskey associated outcome targets 2
- Date of Board Approval 2
- Component 1 Laying the Foundations of a Safety Net System and Supporting Project Management 2
- Component 2 Cash Transfer Program with Accompanying Measures to Boost Household Productivity 2
- Independent Evaluation Group IEG 3
- Component 3 Public Works Pilot 3
- Dates. 3
- Restructurings 3
- Independent Evaluation Group IEG 4
- 3. Relevance of Objectives 4
- Rationale 4
- Country context 4
- Independent Evaluation Group IEG 5
- Alignment with Strategy 5
- Rating 5
- 4. Achievement of Objectives Efficacy 5
- OBJECTIVE 1 5
- Objective 5
- Rationale 5
- Outputs and intermediate results 5
- Independent Evaluation Group IEG 6
- Outcomes 6
- Rating 6
- OBJECTIVE 2 6
- Objective 6
- Independent Evaluation Group IEG 7
- Rationale 7
- Outputs and intermediate results 7
- Outcomes 7
- Independent Evaluation Group IEG 8
- Rating 8
- OBJECTIVE 3 8
- Objective 8
- Rationale 8
- Outputs and intermediate results 8
- Outcomes 8
- Rating 8
- Independent Evaluation Group IEG 9
- OVERALL EFFICACY 9
- Rationale 9
- Overall Efficacy Rating 9
- 5. Efficiency 9
- Independent Evaluation Group IEG 10
- Efficiency Rating 10
- Rate Available Point value CoverageScope 10
- 6. Outcome 10
- Outcome Rating 10
- 7. Risk to Development Outcome 10
- Independent Evaluation Group IEG 11
- 8. Assessment of Bank Performance 11
- Quality-at-Entry Rating 11
- Independent Evaluation Group IEG 12
- Quality of Supervision Rating 12
- Overall Bank Performance Rating 12
- 9. ME Design Implementation Utilization 12
- Independent Evaluation Group IEG 13
- Independent Evaluation Group IEG 14
- ME Quality Rating 14
- 10. Other Issues 14
- Independent Evaluation Group IEG 15
- 11. Ratings 15
- Ratings ICR IEG Reason for DisagreementsComment 15
- Independent Evaluation Group IEG 16
- 12. Lessons 16
- Pilot programs can pave the way for cash transfers and public works programs to address needs of poor and vulnerable populations. 16
- The establishment of an MIS system upfront to identify and track beneficiaries can be effective 16
- Gender sensitivity can be enhanced by giving consideration to childcare for women and by addressing gender-based violence GBV issues. 16
- 13. Assessment Recommended 16
- Independent Evaluation Group IEG 17
- 14. Comments on Quality of ICR 17
