The document which sets out the national framework for good research conduct and its governance can be found using the following link: Supporting research integrity – UKRI The Concordat to Support the Career Development of Researchers The national Concordat to Support the Career Development of Researchers, also known as the Researcher Development Concordat, outlines the key responsibilities of res. [...] Reviewers and panel members will be advised to consider the unequal impacts of the impact that COVID-19 related disruption might have had on the track record and career development of those individuals included in the proposal and will be asked to consider the capability of the applicant and their wider team to deliver the research they are proposing. [...] It is the PL’s responsibility to articulate in the proposal the added value that an Project co-Lead (international)will bring to the overall leadership of the research and their role in the management of the project, as well as the relevant research experience and expertise that they will bring to the project team. [...] It is expected that the Research and Innovation Associate will be based at the same institution as a leader on the research project and a thorough justification as to how the Research and Innovation Associate will be supported must be provided where this is not to be the case. [...] Cases where the NEIF is unable to provide the type of service required If the NEIF confirm they are unable to provide the type of service required for the proposed project then costs for the dating must be included in the application and justified as normal.
Authors
Related Organizations
- Pages
- 53
- Published in
- United Kingdom
Table of Contents
- Version Control 2
- Introduction 5
- Equality, Diversity, and Inclusion (EDI) 5
- Trusted Research 6
- Concordat to Support Research Integrity 6
- The Concordat to Support the Career Development of Researchers 6
- The Technician Commitment 7
- Research Involving Animals 8
- COVID- 19 Guidance for Applicants: 8
- Definition of research 9
- SECTION 1: FUNDING OPPORTUNITIES 11
- SECTION 2: ELIGIBILITY 12
- Institutional 12
- Project Lead (PL) 13
- Contractual eligibility for Project Lead and Project co-Lead (UK) 14
- Individual eligibility criteria 15
- Project co-leads 15
- Eligibility of Research Council institute staff 16
- Research and Innovation associate 16
- Project Partners, Collaborating Organisations and Sub-Contractors 17
- SECTION 3: COSTS 19
- Open Access 19
- Proposals with an international element 20
- Archaeology: Radiocarbon Dating 21
- Cost headings 23
- Justification of costs 25
- Items expected to be found in a department 25
- SECTION 4: APPLICATION GUIDANCE 26
- Deadlines 26
- Completing the proposal 26
- Subjects 27
- Summary 28
- Non-Academic partners 28
- Technicians 28
- Submitting more than one application to the same scheme 29
- Joint proposals 29
- Confidentiality and use of the information supplied 29
- SECTION 5: ASSESSMENT CRITERIA AND PEER REVIEW 30
- Publication Metrics 30
- UKRI Principles of Assessment and Decision Making 30
- The Peer Review College 31
- Peer Reviewer grading scale 32
- Sifting of proposals 33
- Project Lead Response 33
- Peer review panels 35
- Panel grading scale 35
- SECTION 6: AWARD DECISIONS 37
- Notification of the outcome 37
- Offer acceptance and payment 37
- Resubmission policy 38
- Monitoring 39
- AHRC complaints and appeals procedures 40
- SECTION 7: ADDITIONAL INFORMATION 41
- Access to Research Outputs 42
- AHRC subject remit and proposal classification 43
- Subjects where the AHRC and the ESRC share interests and responsibilities 50
